BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23389199)

  • 21. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
    Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship between x-ray illumination field size and flat field intensity and its impacts on x-ray imaging.
    Dong X; Niu T; Jia X; Zhu L
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5901-9. PubMed ID: 23039629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spectroscopic ultrahigh-resolution full-field optical coherence microscopy.
    Dubois A; Moreau J; Boccara C
    Opt Express; 2008 Oct; 16(21):17082-91. PubMed ID: 18852819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimization of image reconstruction for magnetic resonance imaging-guided near-infrared diffuse optical spectroscopy in breast.
    Zhao Y; Mastanduno MA; Jiang S; Ei-Ghussein F; Gui J; Pogue BW; Paulsen KD
    J Biomed Opt; 2015 May; 20(5):56009. PubMed ID: 26000795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skin color correction for tissue spectroscopy: demonstration of a novel approach with tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Soyemi OO; Landry MR; Yang Y; Idwasi PO; Soller BR
    Appl Spectrosc; 2005 Feb; 59(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 15720765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confocal light absorption and scattering spectroscopic microscopy.
    Fang H; Qiu L; Vitkin E; Zaman MM; Andersson C; Salahuddin S; Kimerer LM; Cipolloni PB; Modell MD; Turner BS; Keates SE; Bigio I; Itzkan I; Freedman SD; Bansil R; Hanlon EB; Perelman LT
    Appl Opt; 2007 Apr; 46(10):1760-9. PubMed ID: 17356619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging.
    Bowen SL; Wu Y; Chaudhari AJ; Fu L; Packard NJ; Burkett GW; Yang K; Lindfors KK; Shelton DK; Hagge R; Borowsky AD; Martinez SR; Qi J; Boone JM; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1401-8. PubMed ID: 19690029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improved monochromatic imaging spectrometer.
    Webb MR; Hieftje GM
    Appl Spectrosc; 2006 Jan; 60(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 16454912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms via a multiple-frequency inverse scattering technique.
    Shea JD; Kosmas P; Hagness SC; Van Veen BD
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4210-26. PubMed ID: 20879582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simulated scatter performance of an inverse-geometry dedicated breast CT system.
    Bhagtani R; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 19378739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization.
    Zbijewski W; De Jean P; Prakash P; Ding Y; Stayman JW; Packard N; Senn R; Yang D; Yorkston J; Machado A; Carrino JA; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4700-13. PubMed ID: 21928644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preclinical evaluation of nuclear morphometry and tissue topology for breast carcinoma detection and margin assessment.
    Nyirenda N; Farkas DL; Ramanujan VK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Apr; 126(2):345-54. PubMed ID: 20446030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitation of tumor uptake with molecular breast imaging.
    Bache ST; Kappadath SC
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4593-4607. PubMed ID: 28600857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image reconstruction of effective Mie scattering parameters of breast tissue in vivo with near-infrared tomography.
    Wang X; Pogue BW; Jiang S; Dehghani H; Song X; Srinivasan S; Brooksby BA; Paulsen KD; Kogel C; Poplack SP; Wells WA
    J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(4):041106. PubMed ID: 16965134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost-effective diffuse reflectance spectroscopy device for quantifying tissue absorption and scattering in vivo.
    Yu B; Lo JY; Kuech TF; Palmer GM; Bender JE; Ramanujam N
    J Biomed Opt; 2008; 13(6):060505. PubMed ID: 19123646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optical phantoms with adjustable subdiffusive scattering parameters.
    Krauter P; Nothelfer S; Bodenschatz N; Simon E; Stocker S; Foschum F; Kienle A
    J Biomed Opt; 2015 Oct; 20(10):105008. PubMed ID: 26473589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Endoscopically compatible near-infrared photon migration probe.
    Lubawy C; Ramanujam N
    Opt Lett; 2004 Sep; 29(17):2022-4. PubMed ID: 15455767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.
    Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H; Primak AN; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2536-47. PubMed ID: 16193784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of optical properties quantification with a dual-step technique for biological tissue analysis.
    Sorgato V; Berger M; Emain C; Vever-Bizet C; Dinten JM; Bourg-Heckly G; Planat-Chrétien A
    J Biomed Opt; 2018 Sep; 23(9):1-14. PubMed ID: 30232845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.