These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23389478)

  • 1. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting reverses the negative influence of gender on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
    Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Zucker M; Ebra G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 44(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 23389478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups.
    Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Zucker M; Ebra G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jul; 90(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 20609757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.
    Rosenblum JM; Harskamp RE; Hoedemaker N; Walker P; Liberman HA; de Winter RJ; Vassiliades TA; Puskas JD; Halkos ME
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1081-9. PubMed ID: 26687889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity-matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery vs single internal mammary artery in 7702 cases of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Saito A; Miyata H; Motomura N; Ono M; Takamoto S;
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 44(4):711-7. PubMed ID: 23543203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries on short- and long-term outcomes: a propensity score matching in accordance with current recommendations.
    Benedetto U; Amrani M; Gaer J; Bahrami T; de Robertis F; Simon AR; Raja SG;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2699-705. PubMed ID: 25256082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting enhances survival in diabetic patients: a 30-year follow-up of propensity score-matched cohorts.
    Dorman MJ; Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Galbut DL; Zucker M; Ebra G
    Circulation; 2012 Dec; 126(25):2935-42. PubMed ID: 23166212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafting in the Elderly: Long-Term Survival Benefit.
    Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Ebra G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 100(4):1374-81; discussion 1381-2. PubMed ID: 26228600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilateral mammary artery grafting increases postoperative mediastinitis without survival benefit in obese patients.
    Ruka E; Dagenais F; Mohammadi S; Chauvette V; Poirier P; Voisine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Dec; 50(6):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 27229669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach.
    Yi G; Shine B; Rehman SM; Altman DG; Taggart DP
    Circulation; 2014 Aug; 130(7):539-45. PubMed ID: 24916209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting improves long-term survival in patients with reduced ejection fraction: a propensity-matched study with 30-year follow-up.
    Galbut DL; Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Zucker M; Ebra G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4):844-853.e4. PubMed ID: 22245240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of using a radial artery in patients already receiving bilateral internal mammary arteries during coronary bypass grafting: 30-day outcomes and 14-year survival in a propensity-matched cohort.
    Grau JB; Kuschner CE; Johnson CK; Ferrari G; Zapolanski A; Brizzio ME; Shaw RE
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 26003960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Remains Underutilized: A Propensity-Matched Multi-Institution Analysis.
    LaPar DJ; Crosby IK; Rich JB; Quader MA; Speir AM; Kern JA; Tribble C; Kron IL; Ailawadi G;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jul; 100(1):8-14; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 26002440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery versus single left internal mammary artery grafting at 17-year follow-up: validation of a contemporary surgical experience.
    Grau JB; Ferrari G; Mak AW; Shaw RE; Brizzio ME; Mindich BP; Strobeck J; Zapolanski A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 41(4):770-5; discussion 776. PubMed ID: 22290908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of pump status and conduit choice in coronary artery bypass: A 15-year follow-up study in 1412 propensity-matched patients.
    Grau JB; Johnson CK; Kuschner CE; Ferrari G; Shaw RE; Brizzio ME; Zapolanski A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1027-33.e2. PubMed ID: 25648476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival after bilateral internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting: Are women at risk?
    Saraiva FA; Girerd N; Cerqueira RJ; Ferreira JP; Vilas-Boas N; Pinho P; Barros A; Amorim MJ; Lourenço AP; Leite-Moreira AF
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():89-95. PubMed ID: 30219542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary Revascularization With Single Versus Bilateral Mammary Arteries: Is It Time to Change?
    DeSimone JP; Malenka DJ; Weldner PW; Iribarne A; Leavitt BJ; McCullough JN; Quinn RD; Schmoker JD; Kramer RS; Baribeau Y; Klemperer JD; Sardella GL; Olmstead EM; Ross CS; DiScipio AW;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Aug; 106(2):466-472. PubMed ID: 29550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Matched Analysis.
    Zhu YY; Seco M; Harris SR; Koullouros M; Ramponi F; Wilson M; Bannon PG; Vallely MP
    Heart Lung Circ; 2019 May; 28(5):807-813. PubMed ID: 30126790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does Use of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting Reduce Long-Term Risk of Repeat Coronary Revascularization? A Multicenter Analysis.
    Iribarne A; Schmoker JD; Malenka DJ; Leavitt BJ; McCullough JN; Weldner PW; DeSimone JP; Westbrook BM; Quinn RD; Klemperer JD; Sardella GL; Kramer RS; Olmstead EM; DiScipio AW;
    Circulation; 2017 Oct; 136(18):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 29084776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting and risk of sternal wound infection: evidence from observational studies.
    Dai C; Lu Z; Zhu H; Xue S; Lian F
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jun; 95(6):1938-45. PubMed ID: 23453745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Myocardial revascularization with arterial conduits: comparison of bilateral internal mammary artery and single internal mammary artery].
    Codecasa R; Milano A; De Carlo M; Levantino M; Tartarini G; Nardi C; Magagnini E; Bortolotti U
    Cardiologia; 1999 Feb; 44(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 10208053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.