These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23389571)
1. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles. Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis. Stokes IA; Aronsson DD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis. Loder RT; Urquhart A; Steen H; Graziano G; Hensinger RN; Schlesinger A; Schork MA; Shyr Y J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Sep; 77(5):768-70. PubMed ID: 7559707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Vertebral Curves Using the Manual Post-It Technique. Gladnick BP; Schreiber JJ; Ishmael CR; Bjerke-Kroll BT; Cunningham ME Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Apr; 30(3):E148-E151. PubMed ID: 28323693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films? De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs. Zmurko MG; Mooney JF; Podeszwa DA; Minster GJ; Mendelow MJ; Guirgues A J Surg Orthop Adv; 2003; 12(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 15008284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured. Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age. Loder RT; Spiegel D; Gutknecht S; Kleist K; Ly T; Mehbod A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):2548-53. PubMed ID: 15543072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans. Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis. Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis. Aubin CE; Bellefleur C; Joncas J; de Lanauze D; Kadoury S; Blanke K; Parent S; Labelle H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(12):E780-90. PubMed ID: 21224755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Allam Y; El-Fiky T; Farghally MY; Al-Sabagh S; Siam AE Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 26223745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters. Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images. Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]