BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23390319)

  • 1. The influence of instructions on object memory in a real-world setting.
    Tatler BW; Tatler SL
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):5. PubMed ID: 23390319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accumulation of visual information across multiple fixations.
    Pertzov Y; Avidan G; Zohary E
    J Vis; 2009 Sep; 9(10):2.1-12. PubMed ID: 19810783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: from fixations to object files.
    Tatler BW; Gilchrist ID; Land MF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):931-60. PubMed ID: 16194942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception.
    Castelhano MS; Mack ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):6.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taking a new look at looking at nothing.
    Ferreira F; Apel J; Henderson JM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Nov; 12(11):405-10. PubMed ID: 18805041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What information survives saccades in the real world?
    Tatler BW
    Prog Brain Res; 2002; 140():149-63. PubMed ID: 12508588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fate of object memory traces under change detection and change blindness.
    Busch NA
    Brain Res; 2013 Jul; 1520():107-15. PubMed ID: 23685191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.
    Nuthmann A; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):20. PubMed ID: 20884595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saccades and covert shifts of attention during active visual search: spatial distributions, memory, and items per fixation.
    Motter BC; Holsapple J
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1261-81. PubMed ID: 17418364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transsaccadic memory for visual object detail.
    De Graef P; Verfaillie K
    Prog Brain Res; 2002; 140():181-96. PubMed ID: 12508590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of previously fixated locations on saccade trajectory during free visual search.
    Sogo H; Takeda Y
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3831-44. PubMed ID: 16938331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Priorities for representation: Task settings and object interaction both influence object memory.
    Kirtley C; Tatler BW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 26335303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The planning of a sequence of saccades in pro- and antisaccade tasks: influence of visual integration time and concurrent motor processing.
    Lavergne L; Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Orriols E; Doré-Mazars K
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():82-95. PubMed ID: 18929544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.
    Brockmole JR; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 16262483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object-based saccadic selection during scene perception: evidence from viewing position effects.
    Pajak M; Nuthmann A
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23547104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.
    Tatler BW; Hirose Y; Finnegan SK; Pievilainen R; Kirtley C; Kennedy A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Oct; 368(1628):20130066. PubMed ID: 24018727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterising the visual buffer: real-world evidence for overwriting early in each fixation.
    Tatler BW
    Perception; 2001; 30(8):993-1006. PubMed ID: 11578084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.