These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23390319)

  • 41. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
    Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spatial memory following shifts of gaze. I. Saccades to memorized world-fixed and gaze-fixed targets.
    Baker JT; Harper TM; Snyder LH
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 May; 89(5):2564-76. PubMed ID: 12740406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between delay period eye movements and visuospatial memory.
    Olsen RK; Chiew M; Buchsbaum BR; Ryan JD
    J Vis; 2014 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 24403394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Location and identity memory of saccade targets.
    Lin IF; Gorea A
    Vision Res; 2011 Feb; 51(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 21115027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.
    Vogel EK; Woodman GF; Luck SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1907-22. PubMed ID: 16356328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of familiarization time, retention interval, and context change on adults' performance in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Sowerby P; Colombo M; Hayne H
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Mar; 44(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 14994266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Of "what" and "where" in a natural search task: Active object handling supports object location memory beyond the object's identity.
    Draschkow D; Võ ML
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27165170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Congruency effects in the remote distractor paradigm: evidence for top-down modulation.
    Born S; Kerzel D
    J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):3.1-13. PubMed ID: 19761336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The long and the short of it: spatial statistics at fixation vary with saccade amplitude and task.
    Tatler BW; Baddeley RJ; Vincent BT
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1857-62. PubMed ID: 16469349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Multiple-object permanence tracking: limitation in maintenance and transformation of perceptual objects.
    Saiki J
    Prog Brain Res; 2002; 140():133-48. PubMed ID: 12508587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An investigation of attention allocation during sequential eye movement tasks.
    Fischer MH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Aug; 52(3):649-77. PubMed ID: 10504902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. What you see is what you need.
    Triesch J; Ballard DH; Hayhoe MM; Sullivan BT
    J Vis; 2003; 3(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 12678628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):882-96. PubMed ID: 14585012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The influence of unattended features on object processing depends on task demand.
    Mayer KM; Vuong QC
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():20-7. PubMed ID: 22306678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Disentangling vision and attention in multiple-object tracking: How crowding and collisions affect gaze anchoring and dual-task performance.
    Vater C; Kredel R; Hossner EJ
    J Vis; 2017 May; 17(5):21. PubMed ID: 28558394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Something from (almost) nothing: buildup of object memory from forgettable single fixations.
    Endress AD; Potter MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2413-23. PubMed ID: 24946867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Can attention select only a fixed number of objects at a time?
    Davis G; Welch VL; Holmes A; Shepherd A
    Perception; 2001; 30(10):1227-48. PubMed ID: 11721824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.