These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23390688)
1. What choice? Abortion-rights activists won epic victory in Roe v. Wade. They've been losing ever since. Pickert K Time; 2013 Jan; 181(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23390688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade. Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mortality from abortion after Roe vs Wade. Smargisso DM; Lester D Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):780. PubMed ID: 12530723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade. Stith R William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate. Bopp J; Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law. Morgan RG Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reality check for 'roe'. Brant M; Thomas E Newsweek; 2006 Mar; 147(10):44-5. PubMed ID: 16521998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A supportive yet critical response to "Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition". Liebegott K Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):61-3. PubMed ID: 21161851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it. Mulder J Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition. Manninen BA Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]