These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23391033)
21. Fracture strength of minimally prepared resin bonded CEREC inlays. Tsitrou E; Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Pahinis K; van Noort R Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 19830967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations. Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations. van den Breemer CRG; Özcan M; Cune MS; van der Giezen R; Kerdijk W; Gresnigt MMM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Aug; 72():102-109. PubMed ID: 28477520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents. Cubas GB; Habekost L; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T J Prosthodont Res; 2011 Jan; 55(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 20934401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design. Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of preparation design on fracture resistance of molars restored with occlusal veneers of different CAD-CAM materials: an in vitro study. Taha AI; Hafez ME BMC Oral Health; 2024 Oct; 24(1):1168. PubMed ID: 39354422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Considerations for Altering Preparation Designs of Porcelain Inlay/Onlay Restorations for Nonvital Teeth. Homsy F; Eid R; El Ghoul W; Chidiac JJ J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 24(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 25754648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with partial ceramic restorations and submitted to two different loading stresses. Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Pinto MB; Demarco FF Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 16827023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 10.9-year survival of pressed acid etched monolithic e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and the type of partial coverage restoration (inlay or onlay). Malament KA; Margvelashvili-Malament M; Natto ZS; Thompson V; Rekow D; Att W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):523-532. PubMed ID: 33012530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored using ceramic onlays with or without fiber posts-an ex vivo study. Keçeci AD; Heidemann D; Kurnaz S Dent Traumatol; 2016 Aug; 32(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 26710085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. Forberger N; Göhring TN J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fracture resistance and fractographic analysis of pressable glass-ceramics with different partial coverage designs for maxillary premolars. Abdelaal AM; Kehela HA; Holiel AA BMC Oral Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):1078. PubMed ID: 39272065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations. Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]