These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23391033)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with ceramic inlays and different base materials.
    Saridag S; Sari T; Ozyesil AG; Ari Aydinbelge H
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 25740162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of various resin cements and immediate dentin sealing on tooth fracture resistance of zirconia inlay restorations.
    Iketani Y; Kobayashi M; Niizuma Y; Sugai R; Manabe A
    Am J Dent; 2021 Aug; 34(4):179-185. PubMed ID: 34370908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Lithium Disilicate MOD Inlays and Onlays with Various Cavity Preparation Designs.
    Yoon HI; Sohn PJ; Jin S; Elani H; Lee SJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e524-e529. PubMed ID: 29533499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fracture strength of teeth restored with ceramic inlays and overlays.
    Morimoto S; Vieira GF; Agra CM; Sesma N; Gil C
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 19738948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with CAD-CAM onlays.
    Ozan G; Eren MM; Dikmen B; Yildiz E
    Am J Dent; 2022 Dec; 35(6):308-314. PubMed ID: 36508186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of ceramic thickness and ceramic materials on fracture resistance of posterior partial coverage restorations.
    Bakeman EM; Rego N; Chaiyabutr Y; Kois JC
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 25330270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and preparation design on the fracture strength of indirectly restored molars.
    Bresser RA; van de Geer L; Gerdolle D; Schepke U; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103950. PubMed ID: 32957242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of load-fatigue performance of posterior ceramic onlay restorations under different preparation designs.
    Kois DE; Chaiyabutr Y; Kois JC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Jun; 33 Spec No 2():2-9. PubMed ID: 22774323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fracture resistance of manually and CAD/CAM manufactured ceramic onlays.
    Yildiz C; Vanlıoğlu BA; Evren B; Uludamar A; Kulak-Ozkan Y
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):537-542. PubMed ID: 23758595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of cavity design on the fracture resistance of zirconia onlay ceramics.
    Oyar P; Durkan R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 21(6):687-691. PubMed ID: 29888712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of preparation design on fracture strength of compromised molars restored with lithium disilicate inlay and overlay restorations: An in vitro and in silico study.
    Hofsteenge JW; Carvalho MA; Borghans PM; Cune MS; Özcan M; Magne P; Gresnigt MMM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106096. PubMed ID: 37659167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical performance of occlusal onlays made of lithium disilicate ceramic in patients with severe tooth wear up to 11 years.
    Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Brix O; Liebermann A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1319-1330. PubMed ID: 31256912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of elastic modulus of inlay materials on stress distribution and fracture of premolars.
    Costa A; Xavier T; Noritomi P; Saavedra G; Borges A
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(4):E160-70. PubMed ID: 24967990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue.
    Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fracture Resistance of Laboratory Composite Versus All-Ceramic Restorations in Class II Inlay Cavity Preparations: An In Vitro Study.
    Agarwal S; Gupta V; Srinkhala ; Singh S; Saxena P; Marvaniya J
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44711. PubMed ID: 37809271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.