These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23391068)

  • 1. Incomplete knowledge of the clinical context as a barrier to interpreting incidental genetic research findings.
    Costain G; Bassett AS
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 23391068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Managing incidental findings: lessons from neuroimaging.
    Borgelt E; Anderson JA; Illes J
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 23391062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reframing the ethical debate regarding incidental findings in genetic research.
    Garrett JR
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):44-6. PubMed ID: 23391061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic incidental findings: reducing the burden to be fair.
    Anastasova V; Blasimme A; Julia S; Cambon-Thomsen A
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):52-4. PubMed ID: 23391065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal implications of an ethical duty to search for genetic incidental findings.
    Price WN
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 23391063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The duty to rescue in genomic research.
    Ulrich M
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 23391064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Nirvana fallacy and the return of results.
    Biesecker LG
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 23391060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to open peer commentaries on "do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?".
    Gliwa C; Berkman BE
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(5):W10-1. PubMed ID: 23557061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A perspective from clinical providers and patients: researchers' duty to actively look for genetic incidental findings.
    Ross KM; Reiff M
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 23391067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ancillary care, genomics, and the need and opportunity for community-based participatory research.
    Zusevics K
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):54-6. PubMed ID: 23391066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?
    Gliwa C; Berkman BE
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):32-42. PubMed ID: 23391059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
    Fernandez CV; Weijer C
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):44-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships with test-tubes: where's the reciprocity?
    Fryer-Edwards K; Fullerton SM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):36-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings.
    Koplin JJ; Savulescu J; Vears DF
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32005225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical considerations in the communication of unexpected information with clinical implications.
    Lavieri RR; Garner SA
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):46-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants.
    Sharp RR; Foster MW
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):42-4; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One size does not fit all.
    Facio FM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):40-2; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Considering the nature of individual research results.
    Beskow LM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):38-40; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
    VanderWalde AM
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seeking context for the duty to rescue: contractualism and trust in research institutions.
    Meagher KM
    Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 25674950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.