146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23391718)
1. Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance.
Park HJ; Ha YS; Park SY; Kim YT; Lee TY; Kim JH; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Kim IY
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 23391718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS).
Lellig E; Gratzke C; Kretschmer A; Stief C
World J Urol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26047652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Gao Y; Jiang CY; Mao SK; Cui D; Hao KY; Zhao W; Jiang Q; Ruan Y; Xia SJ; Han BM
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(4):639-43. PubMed ID: 26732103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the risk of harboring high-grade disease for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer scored as Gleason ≤ 6 on biopsy cores.
Seisen T; Roudot-Thoraval F; Bosset PO; Beaugerie A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 24985552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in the post-prostate-specific antigen screening era: an effect of delayed diagnosis or a shift in patient selection?
Edmund L; Rotker KL; Lakis NS; Brito JM; Lepe M; Lombardo KA; Renzulli JF; Matoso A
Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():87-93. PubMed ID: 27720731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of Chronic Inflammation as a Predictor of Upstaging/Upgrading in Prostate Cancer: Finding a New Group Eligible for Active Surveillance.
Nowroozi MR; Ayati M; Amini E; Aghamiri SM; Momeni SA; Ohadian Moghadam S; Valizadeh F
Urol J; 2020 Jun; 17(4):370-373. PubMed ID: 31953833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Racial variation in prostate cancer upgrading and upstaging among men with low-risk clinical characteristics.
Jalloh M; Myers F; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 24746973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance.
Ferro M; Lucarelli G; Bruzzese D; Di Lorenzo G; Perdonà S; Autorino R; Cantiello F; La Rocca R; Busetto GM; Cimmino A; Buonerba C; Battaglia M; Damiano R; De Cobelli O; Mirone V; Terracciano D
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(11):18424-18434. PubMed ID: 27793023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
Leeman JE; Chen MH; Huland H; Graefen M; D'Amico AV; Tilki D
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Dec; 17(6):e1116-e1121. PubMed ID: 31601512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
