These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23392625)

  • 21. Binding targets' responses to distractors' locations: distractor response bindings in a location-priming task.
    Frings C; Möller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2176-83. PubMed ID: 21097861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets.
    Frings C; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Oct; 60(10):1367-77. PubMed ID: 17853245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the decay of distractor-response episodes.
    Frings C
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20705549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cross-modal distractors modulate oscillatory alpha power: the neural basis of impaired task performance.
    Weise A; Hartmann T; Schröger E; Weisz N; Ruhnau P
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 27468982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No evidence for a cue mismatch in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Hauke R; Buchner A; Niedeggen M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):645-52. PubMed ID: 19123117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Taking a bright view of negative priming in the light of dim stimuli: further evidence for memory confusion during episodic retrieval.
    Stolz JA; Neely JH
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):219-30. PubMed ID: 11605557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An attentional-adaptation account of spatial negative priming: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu XL; Walsh MM; Reder LM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 14(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 24464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus and response repetition effects in the detection of sounds: evidence of obligatory retrieval and use of a prior event.
    Mondor TA; Leboe LC
    Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 17009046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The perceptual nature of the cross-modal priming effect: arguments in favor of a sensory-based conception of memory.
    Vallet G; Brunel L; Versace R
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 20178946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. N270 sensitivity to conflict strength and working memory: A combined ERP and sLORETA study.
    Scannella S; Pariente J; De Boissezon X; Castel-Lacanal E; Chauveau N; Causse M; Dehais F; Pastor J
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 297():231-40. PubMed ID: 26477377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping.
    Frings C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1209-27. PubMed ID: 21707218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 25621576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of modality and repetition in a continuous recognition memory task: Repetition has no effect on auditory recognition memory.
    Amir Kassim A; Rehman R; Price JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():72-80. PubMed ID: 29407247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The official soundtrack to "Five shades of grey": Generalization in multimodal distractor-based retrieval.
    Schöpper LM; Singh T; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3479-3489. PubMed ID: 32533525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):744-56. PubMed ID: 26233234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A mid-central N450 component of the ERP distinguishes trial-by-trial effects of target familiarity and context strength.
    Gibbons H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 21798292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cognitive load reduces visual identity negative priming by disabling the retrieval of task-inappropriate prime information: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Stahl J
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1330():101-13. PubMed ID: 20233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.