These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23392975)

  • 1. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.
    Cela V; Freschi L; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Tana R; Pluchino N
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2638-43. PubMed ID: 23392975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
    Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single-site.
    Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Musacchi V; Stracquadaini M; Bogliolo S; Scudeller L; Spinillo A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):954-961. PubMed ID: 35225752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning curve analysis of multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lee YJ; Lee DE; Oh HR; Ha HI; Lim MC
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 35767099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
    Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.
    Silasi DA; Gallo T; Silasi M; Menderes G; Azodi M
    JSLS; 2013; 17(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 24018076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy as a scarless and gasless surgery.
    Yang YS
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):492-500. PubMed ID: 31728751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
    Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
    Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Prodromidou A; Spartalis E; Tsourouflis G; Dimitroulis D; Nikiteas N
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):679-686. PubMed ID: 31956926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Tang FH; Tsai EM
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():1827913. PubMed ID: 28373977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
    Sendag F; Zeybek B; Akdemir A; Ozgurel B; Oztekin K
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 24376016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic hysterectomy using the Vessel Sealer for myomatous uteri: technique and clinical outcome.
    Hoste G; Van Trappen P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():241-4. PubMed ID: 26454809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
    Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy.
    Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozgurel B; Oztekin MK; Sendag F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 24952342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
    Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.