These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23393292)

  • 1. Study of the radio-opacity of base and liner dental materials using a digital radiography system.
    Lachowski KM; Botta SB; Lascala CA; Matos AB; Sobral MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20120153. PubMed ID: 23393292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of external energy sources on the dynamic setting process of glass-ionomer cements.
    de Oliveira BMB; Agostini IE; Baesso ML; Menezes-Silva R; Borges AFS; Navarro MFL; Nicholson JW; Sidhu SK; Pascotto RC
    Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):450-456. PubMed ID: 30709613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro radiographic analysis of the density of dental luting cements as measured by CCD-based digital radiography.
    Antonijevic D; Jevremovic D; Jovanovic S; Obradovic-Djuricic K
    Quintessence Int; 2012 May; 43(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 22536594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiopacity of bulk fill flowable resin composite materials.
    Yildirim T; Ayar MK; Akdag MS; Yesilyurt C
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 20(2):200-204. PubMed ID: 28091437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography for radiometric differentiation of dental cements.
    Baksi BG; Ermis RB
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Oct; 38(9):e532-6. PubMed ID: 17873973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiopacities of glass ionomer cements measured with direct digital radiographic system.
    Stona P; Bertella SM; Rockenbach MI; Holderbaum RM; Weber JB
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2012; 79(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 22828759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiopacity of resin-modified glass ionomer liners and bases.
    Shah PM; Sidhu SK; Chong BS; Ford TR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Mar; 77(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 9069077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of open-sandwich vs. adhesive restorative techniques on enamel and dentine demineralization: an in situ study.
    Kirsten GA; Rached RN; Mazur RF; Vieira S; Souza EM
    J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):872-80. PubMed ID: 23851134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiopacity of flowable composite by a digital technique.
    Dukić W; Delija B; Lešić S; Dubravica I; Derossi D
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 23092144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning electron microscope analysis of internal adaptation of materials used for pulp protection under composite resin restorations.
    Peliz MI; Duarte S; Dinelli W
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 16036128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micromechanical Intervention in Sandwich Restoration.
    Khan TN; Ali Abidi SY; Nawaz Khan KB; Ahmed S; Rehman Qazi FU; Saeed N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):781-4. PubMed ID: 26577960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements?
    Cabral MF; Martinho RL; Guedes-Neto MV; Rebelo MA; Pontes DG; Cohen-Carneiro F
    Restor Dent Endod; 2015 Aug; 40(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 26295024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative radiopacity of six flowable resin composites.
    Ergücü Z; Türkün LS; Onem E; Güneri P
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):436-40. PubMed ID: 20672728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems.
    Öztürk E; Bolay Ş; Hickel R; Ilie N
    J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 22521701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations.
    Vichi A; Margvelashvili M; Goracci C; Papacchini F; Ferrari M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1497-506. PubMed ID: 23086332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives.
    Gordan VV; Boyer D; Söderholm KJ
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 9699443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.