These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23393292)

  • 21. Does Making An Adhesive System Radiopaque by Filler Addition Affect Its Bonding Properties?
    Martins GC; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Zander-Grande C; Meier M; Mazur RF; Gomes OM
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Dec; 17(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 26734675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions.
    Cruz AD; Lobo IC; Lemos AL; Aguiar MF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140360. PubMed ID: 25629721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.
    Rojpaibool T; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Lining Materials on Shear Bond Strength for Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Caneppele TM; Bresciani E; Da Silva Ávila DM; Barcellos DC; Pucci CR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2017; 37(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 27977829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
    Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities.
    Costa CA; Giro EM; do Nascimento AB; Teixeira HM; Hebling J
    Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 14511732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration.
    Kwon OH; Kim DH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 20672729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mineral content of ionomer cements and preventive effect of these cements against white spot lesions around restorations.
    Paiva LF; Fidalgo TK; Maia LC
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 25184496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Damage mechanics and load failure of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures.
    Dyer SR; Sorensen JA; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1104-10. PubMed ID: 16043217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications.
    de Lima Navarro MF; Pascotto RC; Borges AFS; Soares CJ; Raggio DP; Rios D; Bresciani E; Molina GF; Ngo HC; Miletić I; Frencken J; Wang L; Menezes-Silva R; Puppin-Rontani RM; de Carvalho RM; Gurgan S; Leal SC; Tüzüner T; Fagundes TC; Nicholson JW; Sidhu SK
    J Dent; 2021 Apr; 107():103609. PubMed ID: 33610589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electron probe microanalysis of ion exchange of selected elements between dentine and adhesive restorative materials.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Jun; 52(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 17687959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiopacity of different resin-based and conventional luting cements compared to human and bovine teeth.
    Pekkan G; Ozcan M
    Dent Mater J; 2012 Feb; 31(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22277608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials.
    Fonseca RB; Branco CA; Soares PV; Correr-Sobrinho L; Haiter-Neto F; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Soares CJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Jun; 10(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 16498526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study of radiopacity of resin-based and glass ionomer-based bulk-fill restoratives using digital radiography.
    Yasa B; Kucukyilmaz E; Yasa E; Ertas ET
    J Oral Sci; 2015 Jun; 57(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 26062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sealing ability, water sorption, solubility and toothbrushing abrasion resistance of temporary filling materials.
    Pieper CM; Zanchi CH; Rodrigues-Junior SA; Moraes RR; Pontes LS; Bueno M
    Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):893-9. PubMed ID: 19549149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.