These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23394072)

  • 1. ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions.
    Li GB; Yang LL; Wang WJ; Li LL; Yang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23394072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computation of binding energies including their enthalpy and entropy components for protein-ligand complexes using support vector machines.
    Koppisetty CA; Frank M; Kemp GJ; Nyholm PG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2559-70. PubMed ID: 24050538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distance dependent scoring function for describing protein-ligand intermolecular interactions.
    Artemenko N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 18290639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities.
    Krammer A; Kirchhoff PD; Jiang X; Venkatachalam CM; Waldman M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Apr; 23(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 15781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities using novel geometrical descriptors and machine-learning methods.
    Deng W; Breneman C; Embrechts MJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):699-703. PubMed ID: 15032552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities: a low scoring game?
    Marsden PM; Puvanendrampillai D; Mitchell JB; Glen RC
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3267-73. PubMed ID: 15534704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel method for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration.
    Li S; Xi L; Wang C; Li J; Lei B; Liu H; Yao X
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):900-9. PubMed ID: 18785151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.
    Friesner RA; Murphy RB; Repasky MP; Frye LL; Greenwood JR; Halgren TA; Sanschagrin PC; Mainz DT
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(21):6177-96. PubMed ID: 17034125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes.
    Raha K; Merz KM
    J Med Chem; 2005 Jul; 48(14):4558-75. PubMed ID: 15999994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PRL-Dock: protein-ligand docking based on hydrogen bond matching and probabilistic relaxation labeling.
    Wu MY; Dai DQ; Yan H
    Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(9):2137-53. PubMed ID: 22544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specific empirical free energy function for automated docking of carbohydrates to proteins.
    Laederach A; Reilly PJ
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Nov; 24(14):1748-57. PubMed ID: 12964193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An example of a protein ligand found by database mining: description of the docking method and its verification by a 2.3 A X-ray structure of a thrombin-ligand complex.
    Burkhard P; Taylor P; Walkinshaw MD
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Mar; 277(2):449-66. PubMed ID: 9514757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SFCscore(RF): a random forest-based scoring function for improved affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Zilian D; Sotriffer CA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1923-33. PubMed ID: 23705795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PostDOCK: a structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes.
    Springer C; Adalsteinsson H; Young MM; Kegelmeyer PW; Roe DC
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):6821-31. PubMed ID: 16250641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.