BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23394409)

  • 1. Patient's willingness to opt for external cephalic version.
    Vlemmix F; Kuitert M; Bais J; Opmeer B; van der Post J; Mol BW; Kok M
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Mar; 34(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 23394409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [External cephalic version in case of persisting breech presentation at term: motivations and women's experience of the intervention].
    Pichon M; Guittier MJ; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013; 41(7-8):427-32. PubMed ID: 23102577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting.
    Raynes-Greenow CH; Roberts CL; Barratt A; Brodrick B; Peat B
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15177862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of parity on obstetric and neonatal outcome of external cephalic version.
    El-Toukhy T; Ramadan G; Maidman D; Hanna L; Waterstone M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 27(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 17896255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
    Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.
    Watts NP; Petrovska K; Bisits A; Catling C; Homer CS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):248. PubMed ID: 27561416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
    Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation.
    Sullivan JT; Grobman WA; Bauchat JR; Scavone BM; Grouper S; McCarthy RJ; Wong CA
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009 Oct; 18(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 19682886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analgesia/anesthesia for external cephalic version.
    Weiniger CF
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2013 Jun; 26(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 23614959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term.
    Ezra Y; Elram T; Plotkin V; Elchalal U
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 May; 90(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 10767512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term.
    Fok WY; Chan LW; Leung TY; Lau TK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):748-51. PubMed ID: 16026399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized trial of anaesthetic interventions in external cephalic version for breech presentation.
    Khaw KS; Lee SW; Ngan Kee WD; Law LW; Lau TK; Ng FF; Leung TY
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jun; 114(6):944-50. PubMed ID: 25962611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
    Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External cephalic version (ECV): experience in a sub-Saharan African hospital.
    Feyi-Waboso PA; Selo-Ojeme CO; Selo-Ojeme DO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 May; 26(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 16753680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence, outcome, and women's experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population.
    Rijnders M; Offerhaus P; van Dommelen P; Wiegers T; Buitendijk S
    Birth; 2010 Jun; 37(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 20557535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy.
    Rueangchainikhom W; Sarapak S; Prommas S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jan; 91(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18386539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External validation of a prediction model for successful external cephalic version.
    De Hundt M; Vlemmix F; Kok M; Van Der Steeg JW; Bais JM; Mol BW; Van Der Post JA
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Mar; 29(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 21809265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands.
    Rijnders M; Herschderfer K; Prins M; van Baaren R; van Veelen AJ; Schönbeck Y; Buitendijk S
    Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17196716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.