These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A comparison of sampling efficiency and internal noise level in young and old subjects. Pardhan S; Gilchrist J; Elliott DB; Beh GK Vision Res; 1996 Jun; 36(11):1641-8. PubMed ID: 8759465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast sensitivity decline with ageing: a neural or optical phenomenon? Elliott DB Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 3454919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of orientation on spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis. Tulunay-Keesey U; Brooks BR; Kukuljan R; Ver Hoeve JN Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 8116264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual ageing: unspecific decline of the responses to luminance and colour. Fiorentini A; Porciatti V; Morrone MC; Burr DC Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(21):3557-66. PubMed ID: 8977022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of spatial and temporal vision during childhood. Ellemberg D; Lewis TL; Liu CH; Maurer D Vision Res; 1999 Jul; 39(14):2325-33. PubMed ID: 10367054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal summation functions for detection of sine-wave gratings in young and older adults. Sturr JF; Church KL; Taub HA Vision Res; 1988; 28(11):1247-53. PubMed ID: 3253995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective broad-band spatial frequency loss in contrast sensitivity functions. Comparison with a model based on optical transfer functions. Bour LJ; Apkarian P Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 37(12):2475-84. PubMed ID: 8933764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative contributions of optical and neural limitations to human contrast sensitivity at different luminance levels. Losada MA; Navarro R; Santamaría J Vision Res; 1993 Nov; 33(16):2321-36. PubMed ID: 8273296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of contrast sensitivity in the human infant. Norcia AM; Tyler CW; Hamer RD Vision Res; 1990; 30(10):1475-86. PubMed ID: 2247957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Healthy Aging Impairs Photon Absorption Efficiency of Cones. Silvestre D; Arleo A; Allard R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Feb; 60(2):544-551. PubMed ID: 30716150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modelling contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal illuminance and grating area. Rovamo J; Mustonen J; Näsänen R Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(10):1301-14. PubMed ID: 8023438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foveal flicker sensitivity in healthy aging eyes. I. Compensating for pupil variation. Mayer MJ; Kim CB; Svingos A; Glucs A J Opt Soc Am A; 1988 Dec; 5(12):2201-9. PubMed ID: 3230490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simulating age-related optical changes in the human eye. Whitaker D; Elliott DB Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 82(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 1306478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aging-related foveal flicker sensitivity losses in normal observers. Kuyk TK; Wesson MD Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Oct; 68(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 1749597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infant spatiotemporal vision: dependence of spatial contrast sensitivity on temporal frequency. Swanson WH; Birch EE Vision Res; 1990; 30(7):1033-48. PubMed ID: 2392833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. McAnany JJ; Alexander KR Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(26):2615-24. PubMed ID: 18374385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aging and pattern visual evoked potentials. Tobimatsu S Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Mar; 72(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 7609942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]