These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23395322)

  • 1. Attempted validation of a method to locate entry and exit foramens of the branches of the trigeminal nerve; benefits for an original cephalometric analysis technique.
    Diouf JS; Badiane A; Ngom PI; Crocquet M; Ousehal L; Diop-Bâ K; Diagne F; Danguy M
    Int Orthod; 2013 Mar; 11(1):104-17. PubMed ID: 23395322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Value of trigeminal nerve foramina-based approach in the cephalometric study of sagittal morphology of Senegalese subjects].
    Diouf JS; Crocquet M; Ngom PI; Danguy M; Diagne F; Diop-Ba K; Badiane A
    Orthod Fr; 2010 Jun; 81(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20519110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls.
    Tng TT; Chan TC; Hägg U; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 8005198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trigeminal foraminal patterns in "skeletal" Class II and Class III adults--a radiocephalometric study.
    Laamanen U; Tiekso J; Koski K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1993; 89(3-4):87-93. PubMed ID: 8134332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Analgesia of the terminal branches of the trigeminal nerve as related to variations in their points of exit in the facial skeleton].
    Kadanoff D; Mutafov S; Jordanov J
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Nov; 24(11):748-54. PubMed ID: 4533167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A feasibility study on pinpointing the branches of trigeminal nerve in radiofrequency ablation.
    He YQ; He S; Shen YX; Qian C
    Br J Neurosurg; 2013 Apr; 27(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 22957825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foramen ovale puncture, lesioning accuracy, and avoiding complications: microsurgical anatomy study with clinical implications.
    Peris-Celda M; Graziano F; Russo V; Mericle RA; Ulm AJ
    J Neurosurg; 2013 Nov; 119(5):1176-93. PubMed ID: 23600929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variations of the frontal exit of the supraorbital nerve: an anatomic study.
    Beer GM; Putz R; Mager K; Schumacher M; Keil W
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Aug; 102(2):334-41. PubMed ID: 9703067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Lateral teleradiography of the cranium: the effect of head positioning in the interpretation of cephalometric tracings. An experimental study on a phantom].
    Blanc M; Garattini G; Moruzzi E
    Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 9465234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
    Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Euclid and Pythagorus in the 21st century. A proposal on various harmonious craniofacial and occlusal constants].
    Blocquel H
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2001; 43(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11799726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences between direct (anthropometric) and indirect (cephalometric) measurements of the skull.
    Farkas LG; Tompson BD; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Jan; 13(1):105-8; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11887005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sagittal craniofacial growth evaluated on children dry skulls using V2 and V3 canal openings as references.
    Harnet JC; Lombardi T; Lutz JC; Meyer P; Kahn JL
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2007 Oct; 29(7):589-94. PubMed ID: 17653618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric investigation of craniomaxillofacial structures during the prenatal period: a cadaver study.
    Esenlik E; Sener EH; Yılmaz HH; Malas MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 24485737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prenatal assessment of the antero-posterior jaw relationship in human fetuses: from anatomical to ultrasound cephalometric analysis.
    Captier G; Faure JM; Bäumler M; Canovas F; Demattei C; Daures JP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 20815708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
    Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cephalometry and digital radiography. Technical note].
    Scutellari PN; Orzincolo C; Verna C; Vincenzi E; Lucci R; Vita F
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8296014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.