These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23395333)

  • 21. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Crystallization Firing on Marginal Gap of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
    Gold SA; Ferracane JL; da Costa J
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):63-66. PubMed ID: 28514042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD/CAM zirconia copings.
    Lins L; Bemfica V; Queiroz C; Canabarro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 25453562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: Press vs. CAD/CAM.
    Azar B; Eckert S; Kunkela J; Ingr T; Mounajjed R
    Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e001. PubMed ID: 29364328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
    Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: a three-year follow up.
    Boeckler AF; Lee H; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 19853170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
    Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CAD/CAM system influence marginal fit of different ceramic types?
    de Almeida IG; Antunes DB; Braun NX; Restani A; Straioto FG; Galhano GA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(1):127-129. PubMed ID: 30900671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.
    Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen J
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18620749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal and Internal Fit of Conventional Metal-Ceramic and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Nam SJ; Yoon MJ; Kim WH; Ryu GJ; Bang MK; Huh JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 26340013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems.
    Baldissara P; Llukacej A; Ciocca L; Valandro FL; Scotti R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20620365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic.
    Ortega R; Gonzalo E; Gomez-Polo M; Suárez MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 26340011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
    Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.