474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23395334)
21. The effect of different reinforcements on the fracture toughness of materials for interim restorations.
Geerts GA; Overturf JH; Oberholzer TG
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):461-7. PubMed ID: 18514668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Penetration depth of monomer systems into acrylic resin denture teeth used as pontics.
Perea L; Matinlinna JP; Tolvanen M; Mannocci F; Watson TF; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):480-7. PubMed ID: 25749088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of high fiber fraction on some mechanical properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite.
Abdulmajeed AA; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 21115192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Short glass fiber-reinforced composite with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix for temporary crowns and bridges.
Garoushi SK; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jan; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 18176644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations.
Alt V; Hannig M; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 21176946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Marginal adaptation of 1 fiber-reinforced composite and 2 all-ceramic inlay fixed partial denture systems.
Monaco C; Krejci I; Bortolotto T; Perakis N; Ferrari M; Scotti R
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 16900821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fracture behavior of discontinuous fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial denture before and after fatigue aging.
Lassila L; Mangoush E; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Apr; 67(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 35896342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flowable fiber reinforced composite restorations.
Lassila L; Keulemans F; Säilynoja E; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S
Dent Mater; 2018 Apr; 34(4):598-606. PubMed ID: 29366493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens.
Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Trottmann A; Özcan M; Fischer J; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Dec; 16(6):1669-77. PubMed ID: 22209963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro examination of the fracture strength of 3 different fiber-reinforced composite and 1 all-ceramic posterior inlay fixed partial denture systems.
Kolbeck C; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 12501138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Damage mechanics and load failure of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures.
Dyer SR; Sorensen JA; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1104-10. PubMed ID: 16043217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of surface preparation on the failure load of a highly filled composite resin bonded to a denture base resin.
Shimizu H; Kawaguchi T; Yoshida K; Tsue F; Takahashi Y
J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):684-7. PubMed ID: 19682216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of nanofiller fractions and temperature on polymerization shrinkage on glass fiber reinforced filling material.
Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 17675144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of E-glass fibers and acrylic resin thickness on fracture load in a simulated implant-supported overdenture prosthesis.
Fajardo RS; Pruitt LA; Finzen FC; Marshall GW; Singh S; Curtis DA
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 22133394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fiber-reinforced composites: effect of fiber position, fiber framework, and wetting agent on flexural strength.
Tirapelli C; Ravagnani C; Panzeri Fde C; Panzeric H
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(3):201-2. PubMed ID: 15945305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.
Ozcan M; Breuklander MH; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 15798684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
Puschmann D; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 19583761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
