136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23395545)
1. Rebound tonometry in children: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Lambert SR; Melia M; Buffenn AN; Chiang MF; Simpson JL; Yang MB
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):e21-7. PubMed ID: 23395545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.
Gandhi NG; Prakalapakorn SG; El-Dairi MA; Jones SK; Freedman SF
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal thickness measurement in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Dueker DK; Singh K; Lin SC; Fechtner RD; Minckler DS; Samples JR; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1779-87. PubMed ID: 17822980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry.
Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; Selleri P
Vet Rec; 2013 Apr; 172(15):396. PubMed ID: 23486504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
Schlote T; Landenberger H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of lateral decubitus position on intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients with asymmetric visual field loss.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Lee DS; Kim DM
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):731-5. PubMed ID: 23260257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deviations between transpalpebral tonometry using TGDc-01 and Goldmann applanation tonometry depending on the IOP level.
Troost A; Specht K; Krummenauer F; Yun SH; Schwenn O
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 243(9):853-8. PubMed ID: 16158308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements.
Gaton DD; Ehrenberg M; Lusky M; Wussuki-Lior O; Dotan G; Weinberger D; Snir M
Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jun; 35(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 20465440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry.
Kim CY; Kuehn MH; Anderson MG; Kwon YH
Eye (Lond); 2007 Sep; 21(9):1202-9. PubMed ID: 16946746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G
Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Saenz-Frances F; Vizzeri G; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
