222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23395815)
21. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up.
Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Auweter SD; Liebhardt S; Mayr D; Willner M; Hahn D; Zanette I; Weitkamp T; Hellerhoff K; Pfeiffer F; Reiser MF; Bamberg F
Eur Radiol; 2013 Feb; 23(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 22932738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of FDG-PET/CT in prediction of underestimation of invasive breast cancer in cases of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed at needle biopsy.
Shigematsu H; Kadoya T; Masumoto N; Matsuura K; Emi A; Kajitani K; Amioka A; Okada M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Oct; 14(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 24962555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Role of combined BI-RADS assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast on 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Lim S; Lee EH; Park JM; Chang YW; Kim HH; Jeong SH
Acta Radiol; 2013 Dec; 54(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 23864064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Incidental breast masses detected by computed tomography: are any imaging features predictive of malignancy?
Porter G; Steel J; Paisley K; Watkins R; Holgate C
Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 19348850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnosis of Tis/T1 breast cancer extent by multislice helical CT: a novel classification of tumor distribution.
Tozaki M; Kawakami M; Suzuki M; Uchida K; Yamashita A; Fukuda K
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(5):187-92. PubMed ID: 14632293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usefulness of MRI of microcalcification lesions to determine the indication for stereotactic mammotome biopsy.
Kikuchi M; Tanino H; Kosaka Y; Sengoku N; Yamashita K; Minatani N; Nishimiya H; Waraya M; Katoh H; Enomoto T; Kajita S; Woodhams R; Watanabe M
Anticancer Res; 2014 Nov; 34(11):6749-53. PubMed ID: 25368286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of multi-detector row computed tomography in detection of the presence and extent of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Kimijima I; Yoshida K; Tamura R; Moriya T
Breast Cancer; 2013 Jan; 20(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 23054842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic Performance of Fused Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Unenhanced or Postcontrast T1-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Shin HJ; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Ha SM; Park JY; Shin KC; Cha JH; Kim HH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Apr; 95(17):e3502. PubMed ID: 27124054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intramammary incidental findings on staging computer tomography.
Surov A; Fiedler E; Wienke A; Holzhausen HJ; Spielmann RP; Behrmann C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2174-8. PubMed ID: 21742452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incidental breast lesions detected on CT: what is their significance?
Moyle P; Sonoda L; Britton P; Sinnatamby R
Br J Radiol; 2010 Mar; 83(987):233-40. PubMed ID: 19546179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of incidental focal hypermetabolic uptake in the breast as detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT: clinical significance and differential diagnosis.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Oh HY; Koh YH; Moon DH
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 22593124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI.
Strigel RM; Eby PR; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20729462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evidence that molecular changes in cells occur before morphological alterations during the progression of breast ductal carcinoma.
Castro NP; Osório CA; Torres C; Bastos EP; Mourão-Neto M; Soares FA; Brentani HP; Carraro DM
Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(5):R87. PubMed ID: 18928525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Impact of breast ultrasound screening in gynecological practice].
Madjar H; Becker S; Doubek K; Horchler T; Mendoza M; Moisidis-Tesch C; Näther B; Niebling K; Pröls U; Schardt AR; Ulrich S; Zahn U
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 20408119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
