495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23395927)
1. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; von Felten S; Schär G
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):604-11. PubMed ID: 22914470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Saceanu S; Cela V; Surlin V; Angelescu CM; Patrascu S; Georgescu I; Genazzani A
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 23790783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Deimling TA; Eldridge JL; Riley KA; Kunselman AR; Harkins GJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 28099699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Solo surgery--early results of robot-assisted three-dimensional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Tuschy B; Berlit S; Brade J; Sütterlin M; Hornemann A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Aug; 23(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 24564722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Siedhoff MT; Carey ET; Findley AD; Riggins LE; Garrett JM; Steege JF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 23084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of tissue trauma after laparoscopic hysterectomy types with retroperitoneal lateral transsection of uterine vessels using ligasure and abdominal hysterectomy.
Demir A; Bige O; Saatli B; Solak A; Saygili U; Onvural A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 17952446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology.
Candiani M; Izzo S; Bulfoni A; Riparini J; Ronzoni S; Marconi A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 200(4):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19136094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
