136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23397180)
1. The Singleton case: enforcing medical treatment to put a person to death.
Garasic MD
Med Health Care Philos; 2013 Nov; 16(4):795-806. PubMed ID: 23397180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
Cantor JD
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
Hensl KB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Murderer can be forced to take medication to become sane enough to be executed.
Gottlieb S
BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7420):889. PubMed ID: 14563734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
Lewis NA
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
Mossman D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
Abeles N
Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
Katz DL
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.
Beck JC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 8054675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
Nakajima N
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US Supreme Court should prevent execution of murderer who no longer remembers his crime.
Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7725):7-8. PubMed ID: 30283113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
Latzer B
Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Heckler v. Chaney: judicial and administrative regulation of capital punishment by lethal injection.
Stolls M
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(2):251-77. PubMed ID: 3836576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competency to be executed and forced medication: Singleton v. Norris.
Zonana HV
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 14584539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychiatrists and capital sentencing: risks and responsibilities in a unique legal setting.
Showalter CR; Bonnie RJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 6743848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Death, ethics and the state.
Kalt BC
Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000; 23(2):487-550. PubMed ID: 12452157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ferguson v. Florida: rationally understanding competence to be executed?
Wadsworth CS; Newman WJ; Burton PR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 24986351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
