These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23397180)

  • 21. Capital punishment and offenders with mental retardation: response to the Penry brief.
    Calnen T; Blackman LS
    Am J Ment Retard; 1992 May; 96(6):557-64; discussion 565-75. PubMed ID: 1344935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Mar; (311):9-33. PubMed ID: 15869037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treating those found incompetent for execution: ethical chaos with only one solution.
    Radelet ML; Barnard GW
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 3233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conceptual and Scientific Defects in the Supreme Court's "Method of Execution" Jurisprudence.
    Dow DR; Newberry JR
    Yale J Biol Med; 2019 Dec; 92(4):793-803. PubMed ID: 31866796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dementia and the Death Penalty.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2019 Jul; 70(7):622-624. PubMed ID: 31258031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
    Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treating criminal offenders in correctional contexts: identifying interests and distributing responsibilities.
    Schopp RF
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):833-55. PubMed ID: 19784945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Godinez v. Moran: the U.S. Supreme Court considers competence to stand trial.
    Appelbaum PS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Oct; 44(10):929-30. PubMed ID: 8225272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Justices restrict forced medication preceding a trial: mental competency issue. In 6-3 ruling, court says use of drugs must be in best interest of defendant.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 14621709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Treating the condemned to death.
    Sargent DA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 3804727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dementia and the Death Penalty.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Nov; 49(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 31813185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Psychiatry and the death penalty: dilemma for mental health professionals.
    Kermani EJ; Drob SL
    Psychiatr Q; 1988; 59(3):193-212. PubMed ID: 3070607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Penry revisited: is execution of a person who has mental retardation cruel and unusual?
    Herbert PB; Young KA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 12108566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physicians must honor refusal of treatment to restore competency by non-dangerous inmates on death row.
    Zonana H
    J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(4):764-73. PubMed ID: 21105940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating Competency for Execution after
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):530-535. PubMed ID: 32675330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities.
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 22396347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.