These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23397226)

  • 41. Effects of survival processing and retention interval on true and false recognition in the DRM and category repetition paradigms.
    Parker A; Dagnall N; Abelson A
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):353-367. PubMed ID: 30130475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Theoretical and forensic implications of developmental studies of the DRM illusion.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF; Zember E
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):365-80. PubMed ID: 21264595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of semantic context on false memories.
    Alakbarova D; Hicks JL; Ball BH
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1555-1567. PubMed ID: 33959893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The role of decision criterion in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false recognition memory: False memory falls and rises as a function of restriction on criterion setting.
    Jou J; Escamilla EE; Arredondo ML; Pena L; Zuniga R; Perez M; Garcia C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):499-521. PubMed ID: 27808007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Post-learning arousal enhances veridical memory and reduces false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Nielson KA; Correro AN
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():198-207. PubMed ID: 28756031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effects of increasing semantic-associate list length on the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false recognition memory: Dual false-memory process in retrieval from sub- and supraspan lists.
    Jou J; Arredondo ML; Li C; Escamilla EE; Zuniga R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2076-2093. PubMed ID: 27606720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. False memory in normal ageing: empirical data from the DRM paradigm and theoretical perspectives.
    Abichou K; La Corte V; Nicolas S; Piolino P
    Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2020 Mar; 18(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 32576546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Persistence of false memories and emergence of collective false memory: collaborative recall of DRM word lists.
    Maswood R; Luhmann CC; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2021 May; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 34037498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Lateralized processing of false memories and pseudoneglect in aging.
    Schmitz R; Dehon H; Peigneux P
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1314-24. PubMed ID: 22818903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adaptive memory: Survival processing increases both true and false memory in adults and children.
    Otgaar H; Smeets T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1010-6. PubMed ID: 20565216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mechanisms underlying the production of false memories for famous people's names in aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Plancher G; Guyard A; Nicolas S; Piolino P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2527-36. PubMed ID: 19410586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.
    Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):833-48. PubMed ID: 20921097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can false memories spontaneously recover?
    Seamon JG; Berko JR; Sahlin B; Yu YL; Colker JM; Gottfried DH
    Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 16766445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Short-term false memories vary as a function of list type.
    McBride DM; Coane JH; Xu S; Feng Y; Yu Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2726-2741. PubMed ID: 31184272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation.
    Okado Y; Stark CE
    Learn Mem; 2005; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15687227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
    Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories: The effect of memory specificity.
    Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; Berry DM; Garner SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 28649899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The benefit (and cost) of drawing as an encoding strategy.
    Meade ME; Klein MD; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 31342856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mindfulness and false memories: state and dispositional mindfulness does not increase false memories for naturalistic scenes presented in a virtual environment.
    Ayache J; Abichou K; La Corte V; Piolino P; Sperduti M
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):571-584. PubMed ID: 33847781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.