BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23397501)

  • 1. Tubular stomach or whole stomach for esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal approach: a comparative clinical study on anastomotic leakage.
    Shu YS; Sun C; Shi WP; Shi HC; Lu SC; Wang K
    Ir J Med Sci; 2013 Sep; 182(3):477-80. PubMed ID: 23397501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
    Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
    Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
    Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of zero anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy followed by whole stomach reconstruction for esophageal cancer: prospective cohort study.
    Kitadani J; Ojima T; Hayata K; Goda T; Takeuchi A; Tominaga S; Fukuda N; Nakai T; Nagano S; Kawai M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Nov; 408(1):451. PubMed ID: 38030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Size of the thoracic inlet predicts cervical anastomotic leak after retrosternal reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Sato S; Nakatani E; Higashizono K; Nagai E; Taki Y; Nishida M; Watanabe M; Oba N
    Surgery; 2020 Sep; 168(3):558-566. PubMed ID: 32611514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.
    van Rossum PSN; Haverkamp L; Carvello M; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26919029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Venous superdrained gastric tube pull-up procedure for hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal reconstruction reduces postoperative anastomotic leakage and stricture.
    Fujioka M; Hayashida K; Fukui K; Ishiyama S; Saijo H; Taniguchi K
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 28575244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of narrowed gastric conduits on anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
    Shen Y; Wang H; Feng M; Tan L; Wang Q
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 19(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 24847029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
    Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.
    Guo J; Chu X; Liu Y; Zhou N; Ma Y; Liang C
    World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 12():402. PubMed ID: 25547979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Causes and prevention of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and reconstruction through different routes for esophageal cancer].
    Fang WT; Chen WH; Fan LM; Cao KJ; Chen Y; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 8(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 16167231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
    World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
    Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of level of anastomosis and anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in anterior mediastinal reconstruction.
    Nishikawa K; Fujita T; Hasegawa Y; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Mitsumori N; Yanaga K
    Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 15(4):231-238. PubMed ID: 30225744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
    Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
    Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.