BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23397767)

  • 1. Objective assessment of tracheoesophageal and esophageal speech using acoustic analysis of voice.
    Sirić L; Sos D; Rosso M; Stevanović S
    Coll Antropol; 2012 Nov; 36 Suppl 2():111-4. PubMed ID: 23397767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early acquisition of esophageal phonation following tracheoesophageal phonation.
    Iwai H; Shimano T; Omae M; Kaneko T; Yamashita T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 126(7):764-8. PubMed ID: 16803718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aerodynamic and sound intensity measurements in tracheoesophageal voice.
    Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tan FM; Tange RA; Schouwenburg PF
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 17127821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Acoustic analysis of the voice restored by using a tracheoesophageal slit-like fistula].
    Jin GW; Yang CH; Xu KX; Xu ZR; Li SC; Chen J; Zhang JX; Zhang ZL
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 14515786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Acoustic voice analysis in phonatory fistuloplasty after total laryngectomy].
    Rosique M; Ramón JL; Campos M; Cervantes J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10217687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity and fundamental frequency control in tracheoesophageal voice.
    Schindler A; Canale A; Cavalot AL; Albera R; Capaccio P; Ottaviani F; Schindler O
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Aug; 25(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 16482982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of various phonatory parameters in laryngectomized patients: comparison of esophageal and tracheo-esophageal prosthesis phonation].
    Gervasio CF; Cavalot AL; Nazionale G; Magnano M; Ragona R; Bussi M; Staffieri A; Cortesina G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Apr; 18(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 9844220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Acoustic comparison of esophageal versus tracheoesophageal speech].
    Mérol JC; Swierkosz F; Urwald O; Nasser T; Legros M
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 10668360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech.
    Kazi R; Kiverniti E; Prasad V; Venkitaraman R; Nutting CM; Clarke P; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington KJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 17184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aerodynamic studies of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation.
    Kinishi M; Amatsu M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(2 Pt 1):181-4. PubMed ID: 3963691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic signal typing for evaluation of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech.
    van As-Brooks CJ; Koopmans-van Beinum FJ; Pols LC; Hilgers FJ
    J Voice; 2006 Sep; 20(3):355-68. PubMed ID: 16185840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitch perturbation measures of voice production of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation.
    Kinishi M; Amatsu M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1986; 13(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 3741270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of comparison between different kinds of alaryngeal speech in laryngectomized patients with euphonic speech].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Kasperuk J; Moskal D; Rutkowski R; Falkowski D
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2010 Apr; 28(166):277-83. PubMed ID: 20491337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aerodynamic and myoelastic contributions to tracheoesophageal voice production.
    Moon JB; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 3669645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Computerized evaluation of acoustic parameters of voice and speech after partial supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy].
    Crevier-Buchman L; Laccourreye O; Monfrais-Pfauwadel MC; Menard M; Jouffre V; Brasnu D
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(7):397-401. PubMed ID: 7645890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Acoustic analysis of tracheoesophageal speech in comparison to esophageal speech after total laryngectomy].
    Olszański W; Gieroba R; Warchoł J; Morshed K; Gołabek W
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 15311589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbal performance of total laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with esophageal speech and tracheoesophageal speech: impacts on patient quality of life.
    Allegra E; La Mantia I; Bianco MR; Drago GD; Le Fosse MC; Azzolina A; Grillo C; Saita V
    Psychol Res Behav Manag; 2019; 12():675-681. PubMed ID: 31616193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of cochlear implantation on some voice parameters.
    Hocevar-Boltezar I; Vatovec J; Gros A; Zargi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 15939488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.