These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23397807)

  • 1. Using virtual reality to assess user experience.
    Rebelo F; Noriega P; Duarte E; Soares M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Dec; 54(6):964-82. PubMed ID: 23397807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation for VR glasses system user experience: The influence factors of interactive operation and motion sickness.
    Yu M; Zhou R; Wang H; Zhao W
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():206-213. PubMed ID: 30487101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards a holistic assessment of the user experience with hybrid BCIs.
    Lorenz R; Pascual J; Blankertz B; Vidaurre C
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):035007. PubMed ID: 24835132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced ergonomics approaches for product design: a user experience ecosystem perspective and case studies.
    Xu W
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 24405167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual vs. real: exploring perceptual, cognitive and affective dimensions in design product experiences.
    Pizzolante M; Bartolotta S; Sarcinella ED; Chirico A; Gaggioli A
    BMC Psychol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 38167121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ergonomics of virtual reality: human factors in developing clinical-oriented virtual environments.
    Riva G; Mantovani G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():278-84. PubMed ID: 10538372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review on ergonomics evaluations of virtual reality.
    Chen Y; Wu Z
    Work; 2023; 74(3):831-841. PubMed ID: 36442175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding UX Better: A New Technique to Go beyond Emotion Assessment.
    Marques L; Matsubara PG; Nakamura WT; Ferreira BM; Wiese IS; Gadelha BF; Zaina LM; Redmiles D; Conte TU
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use.
    Nichols S
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Feb; 30(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 10098819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Living with an autonomous spatiotemporal home heating system: Exploration of the user experiences (UX) through a longitudinal technology intervention-based mixed-methods approach.
    Kruusimagi M; Sharples S; Robinson D
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():286-308. PubMed ID: 28802449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User Experience Evaluation in Shared Interactive Virtual Reality.
    Guertin-Lahoud S; Coursaris CK; Sénécal S; Léger PM
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2023 Apr; 26(4):263-272. PubMed ID: 37071640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to Observe Users' Movements in Virtual Environments: Viewpoint Control in a Power Wheelchair Simulator.
    Alshaer A; O'Hare D; Archambault P; Shirley M; Regenbrecht H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):656-670. PubMed ID: 31306040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virtual reality in medicine.
    Kaltenborn KF; Rienhoff O
    Methods Inf Med; 1993 Nov; 32(5):407-17. PubMed ID: 8295549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual reality roleplays for patients with depression: A user experience evaluation.
    Holsteg S; Askeridis JM; Krajewski J; Mildner P; Freitag S; Müller T; Schnieder S; Gieselmann A; Karger A
    Internet Interv; 2024 Mar; 35():100713. PubMed ID: 38318087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding How Virtual Reality Can Support Mindfulness Practice: Mixed Methods Study.
    Seabrook E; Kelly R; Foley F; Theiler S; Thomas N; Wadley G; Nedeljkovic M
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e16106. PubMed ID: 32186519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the Intent to Interact With VR Using Physiological Features.
    Nguyen W; Gramann K; Gehrke L
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Aug; 30(8):5893-5900. PubMed ID: 37624723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Multimodal Deep Log-Based User Experience (UX) Platform for UX Evaluation.
    Hussain J; Khan WA; Hur T; Bilal HSM; Bang J; Hassan AU; Afzal M; Lee S
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 May; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 29783712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EXecutive-Functions Innovative Tool (EXIT 360°): A Usability and User Experience Study of an Original 360°-Based Assessment Instrument.
    Borgnis F; Baglio F; Pedroli E; Rossetto F; Isernia S; Uccellatore L; Riva G; Cipresso P
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Narrative Review of Methods for Applying User Experience in the Design and Assessment of Mental Health Smartphone Interventions.
    Lemon C; Huckvale K; Carswell K; Torous J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020; 36(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 31973787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a data management tool for investigating multivariate space and free will experiences in virtual reality.
    Morie JF; Iyer K; Luigi DP; Williams J; Dozois A; Rizzo AS
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2005 Sep; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 16167194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.