These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23398502)
1. Practice variation, bias, and experiential learning in cesarean delivery: a data-based system dynamics approach. Ghaffarzadegan N; Epstein AJ; Martin EG Health Serv Res; 2013 Apr; 48(2 Pt 2):713-34. PubMed ID: 23398502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chinese obstetricians' attitudes, beliefs, and clinical practices related to cesarean delivery on maternal request. Sun N; Yin X; Qiu L; Yang Q; Gong Y Women Birth; 2020 Feb; 33(1):e67-e71. PubMed ID: 30935772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between obstetricians' cognitive and affective traits and their patients' delivery outcomes. Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):692.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24907699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study. Luo ZC; Liu X; Wang A; Li JQ; Zheng ZH; Guiyu S; Lou T; Pang J; Bai XL BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 33509100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills. Elliott JP; Russell MM; Dickason LA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 177(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9240597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean. Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Joseph KS; Young DC; Dodds L; O'Connell CM; Allen VM; Chandra S; Allen AC Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 14551010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fitting in? Physician practice style after forced relocation. Chen AJ; Richards MR; Shriver R Health Serv Res; 2024 Aug; 59(4):e14340. PubMed ID: 38886564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of obstetrician characteristics on cesarean delivery rates. A community hospital experience. Poma PA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1364-72. PubMed ID: 10368473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A preventive approach to obstetric care in a rural hospital: association between higher rates of preventive labor induction and lower rates of cesarean delivery. Nicholson JM; Yeager DL; Macones G Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(4):310-9. PubMed ID: 17664497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mode of delivery among Swedish midwives and obstetricians and their attitudes towards caesarean section. Sahlin M; Andolf E; Edman G; Wiklund I Sex Reprod Healthc; 2017 Mar; 11():112-116. PubMed ID: 28159121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Pilot Study of the Perceptions of Actively Practicing Obstetricians in Puerto Rico: Factors that Influence Decision Making in Cesarean Delivery. Carrera AM; Sternke EA; Rivera-Viñas JI P R Health Sci J; 2017 Mar; 36(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 28266695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between physicians' experience after training and maternal obstetrical outcomes: cohort study. Epstein AJ; Srinivas SK; Nicholson S; Herrin J; Asch DA BMJ; 2013 Mar; 346():f1596. PubMed ID: 23538919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malpractice and obstetric practice: the correlation of malpractice premiums to rates of vaginal and cesarean delivery. Johnson CT; Choubey V; Satin AJ; Werner EF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):545-546. PubMed ID: 26767796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. Macfarlane AJ; Blondel B; Mohangoo AD; Cuttini M; Nijhuis J; Novak Z; Ólafsdóttir HS; Zeitlin J; BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 25753683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-adherence to labor guidelines in cesarean sections done for failed induction and arrest of dilation. Escobar CM; Grünebaum A; Nam EY; Olson AT; Anzai Y; Benedetto-Anzai MT; Cheon T; Arslan A; McClelland WS J Perinat Med; 2020 Oct; 49(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 33555148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cesarean delivery on maternal request: survey among obstetricians/gynecologists in south-east Hungary]. Dweik D; Szimjanovszki I; Mészáros G; Pál A Orv Hetil; 2013 Aug; 154(33):1303-11. PubMed ID: 23933609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the mass media on obstetricians' behavior in Norway. Grytten J; Skau I; Sørensen R Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):986-993. PubMed ID: 28774730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]