These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23398704)

  • 1. Narrative text analysis to identify technologies to prevent motor vehicle crashes: examples from military vehicles.
    Pollack KM; Yee N; Canham-Chervak M; Rossen L; Bachynski KE; Baker SP
    J Safety Res; 2013 Feb; 44():45-9. PubMed ID: 23398704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies.
    Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():338-46. PubMed ID: 22763402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems.
    Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():55-64. PubMed ID: 29654988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The real-world safety potential of connected vehicle technology.
    Doecke S; Grant A; Anderson RW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S31-5. PubMed ID: 26027973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motorcycle crashes potentially preventable by three crash avoidance technologies on passenger vehicles.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):513-517. PubMed ID: 29624413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?
    Cicchino JB; Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 38466620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Injury Outcome in Crashes with Guardrail End Terminals.
    Johnson NS; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S103-8. PubMed ID: 26436218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential occupant injury reduction in the U.S. vehicle fleet for lane departure warning-equipped vehicles in single-vehicle crashes.
    Kusano K; Gorman TI; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S157-64. PubMed ID: 25307382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review of military motor vehicle crash-related injuries.
    Krahl PL; Jankosky CJ; Thomas RJ; Hooper TI
    Am J Prev Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1 Suppl):S189-96. PubMed ID: 20117592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rear seat safety: Variation in protection by occupant, crash and vehicle characteristics.
    Durbin DR; Jermakian JS; Kallan MJ; McCartt AT; Arbogast KB; Zonfrillo MR; Myers RK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():185-92. PubMed ID: 25912100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 36853168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How can front crash prevention systems address more police-reported crashes in the United States?
    Kidd DG; Teoh ER; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107199. PubMed ID: 37406545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-world effects of rear cross-traffic alert on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():350-355. PubMed ID: 30580146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost and benefit estimates of partially-automated vehicle collision avoidance technologies.
    Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):104-15. PubMed ID: 27423430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the safety relevance of automatic emergency braking testing programs: An examination of common characteristics of police-reported rear-end crashes in the United States.
    Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S137-S142. PubMed ID: 35767826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.