214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23399211)
41. High performance cellulose nanocomposites: comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose.
Lee KY; Tammelin T; Schulfter K; Kiiskinen H; Samela J; Bismarck A
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2012 Aug; 4(8):4078-86. PubMed ID: 22839594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Engineering and Characterization of Bacterial Nanocellulose Films as Low Cost and Flexible Sensor Material.
Mangayil R; Rajala S; Pammo A; Sarlin E; Luo J; Santala V; Karp M; Tuukkanen S
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Jun; 9(22):19048-19056. PubMed ID: 28520408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Uniaxial drawing of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate]/cellulose acetate butyrate blends and their orientation behavior.
Park JW; Tanaka T; Doi Y; Iwata T
Macromol Biosci; 2005 Sep; 5(9):840-52. PubMed ID: 16136569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ultradrawing novel ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers filled with bacterial cellulose nanofibers.
Yeh JT; Tsai CC; Wang CK; Shao JW; Xiao MZ; Chen SC
Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Jan; 101():1-10. PubMed ID: 24299742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Electromagnetically controlled biological assembly of aligned bacterial cellulose nanofibers.
Sano MB; Rojas AD; Gatenholm P; Davalos RV
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Aug; 38(8):2475-84. PubMed ID: 20300846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Property evaluations of dry-cast reconstituted bacterial cellulose/tamarind xyloglucan biocomposites.
de Souza CF; Lucyszyn N; Woehl MA; Riegel-Vidotti IC; Borsali R; Sierakowski MR
Carbohydr Polym; 2013 Mar; 93(1):144-53. PubMed ID: 23465913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of bacterial cellulose/hyaluronan nanocomposite biomaterials.
Li Y; Qing S; Zhou J; Yang G
Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Mar; 103():496-501. PubMed ID: 24528759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Spectral assignments and anisotropy data of cellulose I(alpha): 13C-NMR chemical shift data of cellulose I(alpha) determined by INADEQUATE and RAI techniques applied to uniformly 13C-labeled bacterial celluloses of different Gluconacetobacter xylinus strains.
Hesse-Ertelt S; Witter R; Ulrich AS; Kondo T; Heinze T
Magn Reson Chem; 2008 Nov; 46(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 18781703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Bacterial cellulose/TiO2 hybrid nanofibers prepared by the surface hydrolysis method with molecular precision.
Sun D; Yang J; Wang X
Nanoscale; 2010 Feb; 2(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 20644807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Combined effect of cellulose nanocrystals, carvacrol and oligomeric lactic acid in PLA_PHB polymeric films.
Luzi F; Dominici F; Armentano I; Fortunati E; Burgos N; Fiori S; Jiménez A; Kenny JM; Torre L
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Nov; 223():115131. PubMed ID: 31426964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Free-standing three-dimensional hollow bacterial cellulose structures with controlled geometry via patterned superhydrophobic-hydrophilic surfaces.
Laromaine A; Tronser T; Pini I; Parets S; Levkin PA; Roig A
Soft Matter; 2018 May; 14(19):3955-3962. PubMed ID: 29736513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. High-barrier coated bacterial cellulose nanowhiskers films with reduced moisture sensitivity.
Martínez-Sanz M; Lopez-Rubio A; Lagaron JM
Carbohydr Polym; 2013 Oct; 98(1):1072-82. PubMed ID: 23987449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Solubilization mechanism and characterization of the structural change of bacterial cellulose in regenerated states through ionic liquid treatment.
Okushita K; Chikayama E; Kikuchi J
Biomacromolecules; 2012 May; 13(5):1323-30. PubMed ID: 22489745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Crystallization kinetics of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites.
Ten E; Jiang L; Wolcott MP
Carbohydr Polym; 2012 Sep; 90(1):541-50. PubMed ID: 24751075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Nano-sized fibrils dispersed from bacterial cellulose grafted with chitosan.
Liu X; Wang Y; Cheng Z; Sheng J; Yang R
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Jun; 214():311-316. PubMed ID: 30926002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Regulated patterns of bacterial movements based on their secreted cellulose nanofibers interacting interfacially with ordered chitin templates.
Kondo T; Kasai W; Nojiri M; Hishikawa Y; Togawa E; Romanovicz D; Brown RM
J Biosci Bioeng; 2012 Jul; 114(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 22578597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Physical, morphological, antimicrobial and release properties of novel MgO-bacterial cellulose nanohybrids prepared by in-situ and ex-situ methods.
Mirtalebi SS; Almasi H; Alizadeh Khaledabad M
Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 May; 128():848-857. PubMed ID: 30731158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Recognition of lysozyme using surface imprinted bacterial cellulose nanofibers.
Saylan Y; Tamahkar E; Denizli A
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2017 Nov; 28(16):1950-1965. PubMed ID: 28784017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Enhancement of crystallinity of cellulose produced by Escherichia coli through heterologous expression of bcsD gene from Gluconacetobacter xylinus.
Sajadi E; Babaipour V; Deldar AA; Yakhchali B; Fatemi SS
Biotechnol Lett; 2017 Sep; 39(9):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28573539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites.
Pommet M; Juntaro J; Heng JY; Mantalaris A; Lee AF; Wilson K; Kalinka G; Shaffer MS; Bismarck A
Biomacromolecules; 2008 Jun; 9(6):1643-51. PubMed ID: 18491942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
