195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23400527)
41. A comparison of outcomes and cost in VHWG grade II hernias between Rives-Stoppa synthetic mesh hernia repair versus underlay biologic mesh repair.
Fischer JP; Basta MN; Mirzabeigi MN; Kovach SJ
Hernia; 2014; 18(6):781-9. PubMed ID: 25249250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Hernia Recurrence and Complications After Abdominal Reconstruction With Reinforced Versus Nonreinforced Biologic Mesh.
Sweitzer K; O'Shea A; Tawil C; Weissberg J; Tomtschik J; Butterfield J; Fowler C; Langstein H; Bell D
Ann Plast Surg; 2024 Apr; 92(4S Suppl 2):S196-S199. PubMed ID: 38556672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Safety and outcome of use of nonabsorbable mesh for repair of fascial defects in the presence of open bowel.
Geisler DJ; Reilly JC; Vaughan SG; Glennon EJ; Kondylis PD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Aug; 46(8):1118-23. PubMed ID: 12907910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. ["Onlay" mesh provides significantly better results than "sublay" reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh--results of a five-years follow-up].
Wéber G; Baracs J; Horváth OP
Magy Seb; 2010 Oct; 63(5):302-11. PubMed ID: 20965863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Components separation technique utilizing an intraperitoneal biologic and an onlay lightweight polypropylene mesh: "a sandwich technique".
Morris LM; LeBlanc KA
Hernia; 2013 Feb; 17(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 22790510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Non-crosslinked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix for the management of complex ventral abdominal wall hernias: a report of 45 cases.
Guerra O; Maclin MM
Hernia; 2014 Feb; 18(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 23934355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects.
Richmond B; Ubert A; Judhan R; King J; Harrah T; Dyer B; Thompson S
Am Surg; 2014 Aug; 80(8):725-31. PubMed ID: 25105388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Onlay mesh repair for treatment of small umbilical hernias ≤ 2 cm in adults: a single-centre investigation.
Melkemichel M; Stjärne L; Bringman S; Widhe B
Hernia; 2022 Dec; 26(6):1483-1489. PubMed ID: 34591212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. National results after ventral hernia repair.
Helgstrand F
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma-A long-term prospective clinical trial.
Birolini C; de Miranda JS; Tanaka EY; Utiyama EM; Rasslan S; Birolini D
Hernia; 2020 Apr; 24(2):307-323. PubMed ID: 31493051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multipoint Suture Fixation Technique for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Component Separation and Onlay Biological Mesh Placement.
Denney B; de la Torre JI
Am Surg; 2017 May; 83(5):515-521. PubMed ID: 28541865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Outcomes of Ventral Hernia Repair After Orthotopic Liver Transplant Using Component Separation and Onlay Biologic Mesh.
Soto E; Zoog E; Nolte MD; Fang HA; de la Torre JI
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6S Suppl 4):S387-S390. PubMed ID: 36921332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Peritoneal bridging versus fascial closure in laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay ventral hernia mesh repair: a randomized clinical trial.
Ali F; Wallin G; Fathalla B; Sandblom G
BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):587-592. PubMed ID: 32463163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Outcomes of complex abdominal herniorrhaphy: experience with 106 cases.
Satterwhite TS; Miri S; Chung C; Spain D; Lorenz HP; Lee GK
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 22421484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study.
Rosen MJ; Bauer JJ; Harmaty M; Carbonell AM; Cobb WS; Matthews B; Goldblatt MI; Selzer DJ; Poulose BK; Hansson BM; Rosman C; Chao JJ; Jacobsen GR
Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):205-211. PubMed ID: 28009747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The Perfect Plane: A Systematic Review of Mesh Location and Outcomes, Update 2018.
Sosin M; Nahabedian MY; Bhanot P
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):107S-116S. PubMed ID: 30138278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Local parastomal hernia repair with biological mesh is safe and effective.
Hufford T; Tremblay JF; Mustafa Sheikh MT; Marecik S; Park J; Zamfirova I; Kochar K
Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):88-90. PubMed ID: 28882360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Long term results of open complex abdominal wall hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: A retrospective cohort study.
Kroese LF; van Eeghem LHA; Verhelst J; Jeekel J; Kleinrensink GJ; Lange JF
Int J Surg; 2017 Aug; 44():255-259. PubMed ID: 28689863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
de Vries FEE; Hodgkinson JD; Claessen JJM; van Ruler O; Leo CA; Maeda Y; Lapid O; Obdeijn MC; Tanis PJ; Bemelman WA; Constantinides J; Hanna GB; Warusavitarne J; Vaizey C; Boermeester MA
Hernia; 2020 Jun; 24(3):459-468. PubMed ID: 32078080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Components separation combined with abdominal wall plication for repair of large abdominal wall hernias following bariatric surgery.
Borud LJ; Grunwaldt L; Janz B; Mun E; Slavin SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 May; 119(6):1792-1798. PubMed ID: 17440358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
