These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23400940)
1. Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Jonsson Funk M; Visco AG; Weidner AC; Pate V; Wu JM Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1279-85. PubMed ID: 23400940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Haya N; Brown J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD012376. PubMed ID: 27696355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Haya N; Marjoribanks J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2(2):CD012079. PubMed ID: 26858090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes? Ow LL; Lim YN; Dwyer PL; Karmakar D; Murray C; Thomas E; Rosamilia A Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1313-20. PubMed ID: 27324758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study. Wu YM; Reid J; Chou Q; MacMillan B; Leong Y; Welk B Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 30327850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing trans-obturator vaginal mesh with native tissue repair in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Allègre L; Callewaert G; Alonso S; Cornille A; Fernandez H; Eglin G; de Tayrac R Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Apr; 31(4):745-753. PubMed ID: 31506808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do patients prefer mesh or anterior colporrhaphy for primary correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a labelled discrete choice experiment. Notten K; Essers BA; Weemhoff M; Rutten A; Donners J; van Gestel I; Kruitwagen R; Roovers J; Dirksen CD BJOG; 2015 May; 122(6):873-880. PubMed ID: 25041082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Milani AL; Damoiseaux A; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Withagen MIJ Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):847-858. PubMed ID: 29167974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Secondary surgery after vaginal prolapse repair with mesh is more common for stress incontinence and voiding dysfunction than for mesh problems or prolapse recurrence. Bartley JM; Sirls LT; Killinger KA; Boura JA Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Apr; 47(4):609-15. PubMed ID: 25697161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D; JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical options for the management of anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort study - results from the PROSPECT Study. Glazener C; Breeman S; Elders A; Hemming C; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; McDonald A; McPherson G; MacLennan G; Norrie J Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(95):1-452. PubMed ID: 28052810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term functional outcomes following mesh-augmented posterior vaginal prolapse repair. Weintraub AY; Friedman T; Baumfeld Y; Neymeyer J; Neuman M; Krissi H Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 135(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 27484924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: Results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset. Caveney M; Haddad D; Matthews C; Badlani G; Mirzazadeh M Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Nov; 36(8):2044-2048. PubMed ID: 28407297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment. Dos Reis Brandão da Silveira S; Haddad JM; de Jármy-Di Bella ZI; Nastri F; Kawabata MG; da Silva Carramão S; Rodrigues CA; Baracat EC; Auge AP Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Mar; 26(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 25199496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review. Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18092333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative POPQ versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension (PREPARE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Jeon MJ; Kim CH; Cho HH; Suh DH; Kim SR BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e034170. PubMed ID: 31911524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]