These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2340155)

  • 1. Hemispheric specialization for emotional expression: a reexamination of results from intracarotid administration of sodium amobarbital.
    Lee GP; Loring DW; Meader KJ; Brooks BB
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Mar; 12(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 2340155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Severe negative emotional reactions in intracarotid sodium amytal procedures: further evidence for hemispheric asymmetries?
    Kurthen M; Linke DB; Reuter BM; Hufnagel A; Elger CE
    Cortex; 1991 Jun; 27(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 1879162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linguistic perseveration in dominant-side intracarotid amobarbital tests.
    Kurthen M; Linke DB; Elger CE; Schramm J
    Cortex; 1992 Jun; 28(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 1499307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The utility of the intracarotid Amytal procedure in determining hemispheric speech lateralization in pediatric epilepsy patients undergoing surgery.
    Hinz AC; Berger MS; Ojemann GA; Dodrill C
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1994 May; 10(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 7923234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional cerebral blood flow and language dominance: SPECT during intracarotid amobarbital testing.
    McMackin D; Jones-Gotman M; Dubeau F; Gotman J; Lukban A; Dean G; Evans A; Lisbona R
    Neurology; 1998 Apr; 50(4):943-50. PubMed ID: 9566376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors in children that predict performance on the intracarotid amobarbital procedure.
    Williams J; Rausch R
    Epilepsia; 1992; 33(6):1036-41. PubMed ID: 1464260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affective self-report during the intracarotid sodium amobarbital test.
    Ahern GL; Herring AM; Tackenberg JN; Schwartz GE; Seeger JF; Labiner DM; Weinand ME; Oommen KJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Jun; 16(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 7929704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. Preoperative and postoperative comparisons.
    Hugdahl K; Carlsson G; Uvebrant P; Lundervold AJ
    Arch Neurol; 1997 Dec; 54(12):1494-500. PubMed ID: 9400358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right hemisphere speech perception revealed by amobarbital injection and electrical interference.
    Boatman D; Hart J; Lesser RP; Honeycutt N; Anderson NB; Miglioretti D; Gordon B
    Neurology; 1998 Aug; 51(2):458-64. PubMed ID: 9710019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram in the intracarotid amobarbital procedure: II. Coherence analysis.
    Ahern GL; Labiner DM; Talwar D; Herring AM; Weinand ME
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 May; 12(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 11221787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Localization of language cortices by functional MR imaging compared with intracarotid amobarbital hemispheric sedation.
    Bahn MM; Lin W; Silbergeld DL; Miller JW; Kuppusamy K; Cook RJ; Hammer G; Wetzel R; Cross D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):575-9. PubMed ID: 9242780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of hemisphere speech dominance and seizure focus on patterns of behavioral response errors for three types of stimuli.
    Rausch R; MacDonald K
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Mar; 33(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 9073371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cerebral language lateralization: evidence from intracarotid amobarbital testing.
    Loring DW; Meador KJ; Lee GP; Murro AM; Smith JR; Flanigin HF; Gallagher BB; King DW
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(8):831-8. PubMed ID: 2247209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intracarotid etomidate is a safe alternative to sodium amobarbital for the Wada test.
    Mariappan R; Manninen P; McAndrews MP; Cohn M; Tai P; Valiante T; Venkatraghavan L
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 25(4):408-13. PubMed ID: 23686105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlates of arterial-filling patterns in the intracarotid amobarbital procedure.
    Perrine K; Devinsky O; Luciano DJ; Choi IS; Nelson PK
    Arch Neurol; 1995 Jul; 52(7):712-6. PubMed ID: 7619028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual neglect during intracarotid amobarbital testing.
    Spiers PA; Schomer DL; Blume HW; Kleefield J; O'Reilly G; Weintraub S; Osborne-Shaefer P; Mesulam MM
    Neurology; 1990 Oct; 40(10):1600-6. PubMed ID: 2098013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual asymmetry on the dichotic fused words test and cerebral speech lateralization determined by the carotid sodium amytal test.
    Zatorre RJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(10):1207-19. PubMed ID: 2480551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A reconsideration of bilateral language representation based on the intracarotid amobarbital procedure.
    Risse GL; Gates JR; Fangman MC
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Feb; 33(1):118-32. PubMed ID: 9056279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of patterns of cerebral language dominance. An amobarbital study.
    Kurthen M; Helmstaedter C; Linke DB; Hufnagel A; Elger CE; Schramm J
    Brain Lang; 1994 May; 46(4):536-64. PubMed ID: 8044676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Affective self-report during the intracarotid sodium amobarbital test: group differences.
    Ahern GL; Herring AM; Labiner DM; Weinand ME; Hutzler R
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2000 Sep; 6(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 11011512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.