253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23402356)
1. Effect of model parameters on finite element analysis of micromotions in implant dentistry.
Winter W; Klein D; Karl M
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23402356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.
Geng JP; Xu DW; Tan KB; Liu GR
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15453222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of macro-design of immediately loaded implants on micromotion and stress distribution in surrounding bone using finite element analysis.
Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M
Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 19667823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micromotion analysis of different implant configuration, bone density, and crestal cortical bone thickness in immediately loaded mandibular full-arch implant restorations: A nonlinear finite element study.
Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Kirita T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 29214714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
