These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23402679)

  • 1. Finding the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) in signed numbers: notational effects in accessing number representation.
    Chinello A; de Hevia MD; Geraci C; Girelli L
    Funct Neurol; 2012; 27(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 23402679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of deafness on numerical tasks implying visuospatial and verbal processes.
    Buyle M; Vencato V; Crollen V
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11150. PubMed ID: 35778415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial associations in number-related tasks: A comparison of manual and pedal responses.
    Schwarz W; Müller D
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 16610269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The hands have it: number representations in adult deaf signers.
    Korvorst M; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 17307766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing implicit and synaesthetic number-space associations: Visuospatial and verbal spatial-numerical associations of response codes.
    Jonas CN; Spiller MJ; Jansari A; Ward J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1262-73. PubMed ID: 24228728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preexisting semantic representation improves working memory performance in the visuospatial domain.
    Rudner M; Orfanidou E; Cardin V; Capek CM; Woll B; Rönnberg J
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 26800983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes.
    Hartmann M; Gashaj V; Stahnke A; Mast FW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1401-14. PubMed ID: 24749934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
    Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.
    Pressigout A; Charvillat A; Mersad K; Doré-Mazars K
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 29633009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users.
    MacSweeney M; Woll B; Campbell R; McGuire PK; David AS; Williams SC; Suckling J; Calvert GA; Brammer MJ
    Brain; 2002 Jul; 125(Pt 7):1583-93. PubMed ID: 12077007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.