These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23403248)

  • 21. Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses.
    Garcia-Alamino JM; Bankhead C; Heneghan C; Pidduck N; Perera R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e015888. PubMed ID: 29122784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Pond GR; Abbasi S
    Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Primer: the fallacy of subgroup analysis.
    Guillemin F
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2007 Jul; 3(7):407-13. PubMed ID: 17599075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
    Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Trial sequential analysis : Sample size calculation for reliable meta-analyses].
    Weibel S; Kranke P
    Anaesthesist; 2017 Feb; 66(2):91-99. PubMed ID: 28144687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evaluation of bivariate random-effects meta-analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes.
    Riley RD; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):78-97. PubMed ID: 16526010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels.
    Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trial sequential methods for meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Wood J
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 26052847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutions.
    Schuit E; Roes KC; Mol BW; Kwee A; Moons KG; Groenwold RH
    Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 4():57. PubMed ID: 25908184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
    Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Why negative meta-analyses may be false?
    Hajek T; Kopecek M; Alda M; Uher R; Höschl C
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):1307-9. PubMed ID: 23402721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of clinical trials: Is there enough evidence?
    Garcia-Alamino JM; Lopez-Cano M
    Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Jan; 98(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 31623821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size correction for treatment crossovers in randomized clinical trials with a survival endpoint.
    Porcher R; Lévy V; Chevret S
    Control Clin Trials; 2002 Dec; 23(6):650-61. PubMed ID: 12505243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trial sequential analysis has the potential to improve the reliability of conclusions in meta-analysis.
    Imberger G; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):254-5. PubMed ID: 23911534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.
    Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Dec; 9():86. PubMed ID: 20042080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimal type I and type II error pairs when the available sample size is fixed.
    Ioannidis JP; Hozo I; Djulbegovic B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):903-910.e2. PubMed ID: 23664493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The primary outcome measure and its importance in clinical trials.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2015 Oct; 76(10):e1320-3. PubMed ID: 26528658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiscale Adaptive Search.
    Hubenko A; Fonoberov VA; Mathew G; Mezic I
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2011 Aug; 41(4):1076-87. PubMed ID: 21303742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The search for truth must go beyond statistics.
    Willett WC
    Epidemiology; 2008 Sep; 19(5):655-6; discussion 657-8. PubMed ID: 18703930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.