403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23403384)
1. Randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents in the treatment of total coronary occlusions: results from the chronic coronary occlusion treated by everolimus-eluting stent randomized trial.
Moreno R; García E; Teles R; Rumoroso JR; Cyrne Carvalho H; Goicolea FJ; Moreu J; Mauri J; Sabaté M; Mainar V; Patricio L; Valdés M; Fernández Vázquez F; Sánchez-Recalde A; Galeote G; Jimenez-Valero S; Almeida M; Lopez de Sa E; Calvo L; Plaza I; Lopez-Sendón JL; Martín JL;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 6(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23403384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome IV (SORT OUT IV).
Jensen LO; Thayssen P; Hansen HS; Christiansen EH; Tilsted HH; Krusell LR; Villadsen AB; Junker A; Hansen KN; Kaltoft A; Maeng M; Pedersen KE; Kristensen SD; Bøtker HE; Ravkilde J; Sanchez R; Aarøe J; Madsen M; Sørensen HT; Thuesen L; Lassen JF;
Circulation; 2012 Mar; 125(10):1246-55. PubMed ID: 22308301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stent versus sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus (ESSENCE-DIABETES): results from the ESSENCE-DIABETES trial.
Kim WJ; Lee SW; Park SW; Kim YH; Yun SC; Lee JY; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee CW; Lee JH; Choi SW; Seong IW; Lee BK; Lee NH; Cho YH; Shin WY; Lee SJ; Lee SW; Hyon MS; Bang DW; Park WJ; Kim HS; Chae JK; Lee K; Park HK; Park CB; Lee SG; Kim MK; Park KH; Choi YJ; Cheong SS; Yang TH; Jang JS; Her SH; Park SJ;
Circulation; 2011 Aug; 124(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 21810659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.
Stone GW; Midei M; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Williams J; Farhat N; Caputo R; Xenopoulos N; Applegate R; Gordon P; White RM; Sudhir K; Cutlip DE; Petersen JL;
Circulation; 2009 Feb; 119(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 19171853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: 1-year outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET).
Kimura T; Morimoto T; Natsuaki M; Shiomi H; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Akasaka T; Takatsu Y; Nishikawa H; Yamamoto Y; Nakagawa Y; Hayashi Y; Iwabuchi M; Umeda H; Kawai K; Okada H; Kimura K; Simonton CA; Kozuma K;
Circulation; 2012 Sep; 126(10):1225-36. PubMed ID: 22824435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of biolimus A9-eluting (Nobori) and everolimus-eluting (Promus Element) stents in patients with de novo native long coronary artery lesions: a randomized Long Drug-Eluting Stent V trial.
Lee JY; Park DW; Kim YH; Ahn JM; Kim WJ; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Yun SC; Yang TH; Lee BK; Lee NH; Yang JY; Shin WY; Park HS; Kim KS; Hur SH; Lee SY; Park JS; Choi YS; Lee SU; Her SH; Park SJ
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 24823426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial.
Stone GW; Midei M; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Williams J; Farhat N; Mahaffey KW; Cutlip DE; Fitzgerald PJ; Sood P; Su X; Lansky AJ;
JAMA; 2008 Apr; 299(16):1903-13. PubMed ID: 18430909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents.
Serruys PW; Silber S; Garg S; van Geuns RJ; Richardt G; Buszman PE; Kelbaek H; van Boven AJ; Hofma SH; Linke A; Klauss V; Wijns W; Macaya C; Garot P; DiMario C; Manoharan G; Kornowski R; Ischinger T; Bartorelli A; Ronden J; Bressers M; Gobbens P; Negoita M; van Leeuwen F; Windecker S
N Engl J Med; 2010 Jul; 363(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 20554978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial.
Vermeersch P; Agostoni P; Verheye S; Van den Heuvel P; Convens C; Bruining N; Van den Branden F; Van Langenhove G
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 48(12):2423-31. PubMed ID: 17174178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction. 1-year results of the randomized XAMI (XienceV Stent vs. Cypher Stent in Primary PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial.
Hofma SH; Brouwer J; Velders MA; van't Hof AW; Smits PC; Queré M; de Vries CJ; van Boven AJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 60(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 22835668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical outcomes after everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation: final 3-year follow-up of the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Akasaka T; Abe M; Suwa S; Muramatsu T; Kobayashi M; Dai K; Nakao K; Uematsu M; Tarutani Y; Fujii K; Simonton CA; Kimura T;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 24803436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary endpoint results of the EVOLVE trial: a randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent.
Meredith IT; Verheye S; Dubois CL; Dens J; Fajadet J; Carrié D; Walsh S; Oldroyd KG; Varenne O; El-Jack S; Moreno R; Joshi AA; Allocco DJ; Dawkins KD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 59(15):1362-70. PubMed ID: 22341736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 26446596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the EXCELLENT (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss After Stenting) randomized trial.
Park KW; Chae IH; Lim DS; Han KR; Yang HM; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Koo BK; Ahn T; Yoon JH; Jeong MH; Hong TJ; Chung WY; Jo SH; Choi YJ; Hur SH; Kwon HM; Jeon DW; Kim BO; Park SH; Lee NH; Jeon HK; Gwon HC; Jang YS; Kim HS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 58(18):1844-54. PubMed ID: 22018294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A polymer-free dual drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial vs. polymer-based drug-eluting stents.
Byrne RA; Mehilli J; Iijima R; Schulz S; Pache J; Seyfarth M; Schömig A; Kastrati A
Eur Heart J; 2009 Apr; 30(8):923-31. PubMed ID: 19240066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and angiographic outcomes with sirolimus-eluting stents in total coronary occlusions: the ACROSS/TOSCA-4 (Approaches to Chronic Occlusions With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents/Total Occlusion Study of Coronary Arteries-4) trial.
Kandzari DE; Rao SV; Moses JW; Dzavik V; Strauss BH; Kutryk MJ; Simonton CA; Garg J; Lokhnygina Y; Mancini GB; Yeoh E; Buller CE;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 2(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 19463409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting versus Zotarolimus-eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial.
Massberg S; Byrne RA; Kastrati A; Schulz S; Pache J; Hausleiter J; Ibrahim T; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schömig A; Laugwitz KL; Mehilli J;
Circulation; 2011 Aug; 124(5):624-32. PubMed ID: 21768546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients.
Dibra A; Kastrati A; Mehilli J; Pache J; Schühlen H; von Beckerath N; Ulm K; Wessely R; Dirschinger J; Schömig A;
N Engl J Med; 2005 Aug; 353(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 16105990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled trial in second-generation zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stents versus everolimus-eluting Xience V stents in real-world patients: the TWENTE trial.
von Birgelen C; Basalus MW; Tandjung K; van Houwelingen KG; Stoel MG; Louwerenburg JH; Linssen GC; Saïd SA; Kleijne MA; Sen H; Löwik MM; van der Palen J; Verhorst PM; de Man FH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 59(15):1350-61. PubMed ID: 22341737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized comparison of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial.
Leon MB; Mauri L; Popma JJ; Cutlip DE; Nikolsky E; O'Shaughnessy C; Overlie PA; McLaurin BT; Solomon SL; Douglas JS; Ball MW; Caputo RP; Jain A; Tolleson TR; Reen BM; Kirtane AJ; Fitzgerald PJ; Thompson K; Kandzari DE;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Feb; 55(6):543-54. PubMed ID: 20152559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
