623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23403808)
21. Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):914-22. PubMed ID: 16158647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Auditory dysfunction in occupational noise exposed workers.
Sallustio V; Portalatini P; Soleo L; Cassano F; Pesola G; Lasorsa G; Quaranta N; Salonna I
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():95-110. PubMed ID: 9505302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
Sommers MS; Gehr SE
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Correlation between electrically-induced stapedius reflex and discomfort threshold in cochlear implant patients].
Gattaz G; Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E; Gnadeberg D
HNO; 1992 Dec; 40(12):480-3. PubMed ID: 1493968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
Wilson RH; McArdle R
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Stapedius-reflex-audiometry by measuring the threshold for the re-inforcement of a pre-existing reflex (author's transl)].
Reker U; Baumgarten D
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Sep; 59(9):557-61. PubMed ID: 7464371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
Kawase T; Liberman MC
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Synthetic sentence identification (SSI) and contralateral acoustic stapedius reflex].
Anastasio AR; Momensohn-Santos TM
Pro Fono; 2005; 17(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 16389792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
Cheesman MF; Hepburn D; Armitage JC; Marshall K
Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise.
Nechaev DI; Milekhina ON; Supin AY
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140313. PubMed ID: 26462066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.
Porter HL; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Tharpe AM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):e134-42. PubMed ID: 24535557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
Corbin NE; Bonino AY; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
