BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23403808)

  • 41. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
    Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On the relationship of stapedial contraction to central masking.
    Youngblood J; Martin FN
    J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7349870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20. PubMed ID: 16875228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):923-33. PubMed ID: 16158648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development of Masked Speech Detection Thresholds in 2- to 15-year-old Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
    Bonino AY; Ramsey ME; Pancoast ES; Vance EA
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1712-1726. PubMed ID: 33928913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
    Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.
    Grose JH; Griz S; PacĂ­fico FA; AdvĂ­ncula KP; Menezes DC
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 25630394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.
    Martin BA; Sigal A; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1585-99. PubMed ID: 9069627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/.
    Whiting KA; Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):218-31. PubMed ID: 9657596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Stapedius reflex. 1. Stapedius reflex threshold and recruitment].
    Wurzer H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1983 Jul; 62(7):289-92. PubMed ID: 6621210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds.
    Klein AJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30. PubMed ID: 8326068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.