These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
626 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23403808)
81. Constraints on ideal binary masking for the perception of spectrally-reduced speech. Montazeri V; Assmann PF J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):EL59. PubMed ID: 30075663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. Trees DE; Turner CW Audiology; 1986; 25(2):70-83. PubMed ID: 3707439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise. Stuart A Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test. Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination. Buss E; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2467-78. PubMed ID: 19894827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Does cognitive function predict frequency compressed speech recognition in listeners with normal hearing and normal cognition? Ellis RJ; Munro KJ Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 23088164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Contribution of Cochlear Compression to Discrimination of Rippled Spectra in On- and Low-frequency Noise. Milekhina ON; Nechaev DI; Supin AY J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):611-618. PubMed ID: 29785464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Enhancements of the edges of temporal masking functions by complex patterns of overshoot and undershoot. Formby C; Sherlock LP; Ferguson SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2169-87. PubMed ID: 10790043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Suppression and the upward spread of masking. Oxenham AJ; Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3500-10. PubMed ID: 9857509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold. Garinis A; Werner L; Abdala C Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 21878379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. [An analysis of the results of central masking effect on healthy ears]. Zeng X; Liu W; Gong S; Zhong N Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Nov; 15(11):507-9. PubMed ID: 12541833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Effect of tinnitus masker noise on speech discrimination in quiet and two noise backgrounds. Spitzer JB; Goldstein BA; Salzbrenner LG; Mueller G Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 6648316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Acoustic reflexes in the measurement of auditory filters at high levels in normal listeners. Rosen S; Baker RJ Audiology; 1994; 33(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 8129679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Effect of stimulus duration on stapedius reflex threshold in electrical stimulation via cochlear implant. Stephan K; Welzl-Müller K Audiology; 1994; 33(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 8042935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Effect of the acoustic reflex on inner ear damage induced by industrial noise. Borg E; Nilsson R; Engström B Acta Otolaryngol; 1983; 96(5-6):361-9. PubMed ID: 6637452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]