392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23404008)
1. Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases.
Ramesh GC; Pradeep MC; Kumar GA; Girish KS; Suresh BS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 23404008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods.
Türköz Ç; İşcan HN
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 21378094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of first premolar extraction on vertical dimension.
Kocadereli I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10393579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relapse of orthodontically corrected deepbites in accordance with growth pattern.
Pollard D; Akyalcin S; Wiltshire WA; Rody WJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 22464530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Components of overbite correction in lingual orthodontics: molar extrusion or incisor intrusion?
Barthelemi S; Hyppolite MP; Palot C; Wiechmann D
Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):395-412. PubMed ID: 25457390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults.
Hayashida H; Ioi H; Nakata S; Takahashi I; Counts AL
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 20966067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class I malocclusion with severe double protrusion treated with first premolars extraction.
Moresca R
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):127-38. PubMed ID: 25162577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term mandibular skeletal and dental effects of standard edgewise treatment.
Bayirli B; Vaden JL; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 24182584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients.
Deberardinis M; Stretesky T; Sinha P; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 10842113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
