These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23404174)

  • 1. Orthogonal optical force separation simulation of particle and molecular species mixtures under direct current electroosmotic driven flow for applications in biological sample preparation.
    Staton SJ; Terray A; Collins GE; Hart SJ
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Apr; 34(8):1175-81. PubMed ID: 23404174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A low sample volume particle separation device with electrokinetic pumping based on circular travelling-wave electroosmosis.
    Lin SC; Lu JC; Sung YL; Lin CT; Tung YC
    Lab Chip; 2013 Aug; 13(15):3082-9. PubMed ID: 23753015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pico-force optical exchange (pico-FOX): utilizing optical forces applied to an orthogonal electroosmotic flow for particulate enrichment from mixed sample streams.
    Staton SJ; Kim SY; Hart SJ; Collins GE; Terray A
    Anal Chem; 2013 Sep; 85(18):8647-53. PubMed ID: 23964641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A continuous DC-insulator dielectrophoretic sorter of microparticles.
    Srivastava SK; Baylon-Cardiel JL; Lapizco-Encinas BH; Minerick AR
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Apr; 1218(13):1780-9. PubMed ID: 21338990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bi-directional flow induced by an AC electroosmotic micropump with DC voltage bias.
    Islam N; Reyna J
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Apr; 33(7):1191-7. PubMed ID: 22539322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of particle capture in a sawtooth patterned insulating electrokinetic microfluidic device.
    Staton SJ; Chen KP; Taylor TJ; Pacheco JR; Hayes MA
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Nov; 31(22):3634-41. PubMed ID: 21077235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous flow nanoparticle concentration using alternating current-electroosmotic flow.
    Hoettges KF; McDonnell MB; Hughes MP
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Feb; 35(4):467-73. PubMed ID: 24166772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Joule heating effects on electroosmotic flow in insulator-based dielectrophoresis.
    Sridharan S; Zhu J; Hu G; Xuan X
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(17):2274-81. PubMed ID: 21792988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancement of electrokinetically driven microfluidic T-mixer using frequency modulated electric field and channel geometry effects.
    Yan D; Yang C; Miao J; Lam Y; Huang X
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Sep; 30(18):3144-52. PubMed ID: 19764063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring microchannel electroosmotic mobility and zeta potential by the current monitoring method.
    Shao C; Devoe DL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 949():55-63. PubMed ID: 23329435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous manipulation and separation of particles using combined obstacle- and curvature-induced direct current dielectrophoresis.
    Li M; Li S; Li W; Wen W; Alici G
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Apr; 34(7):952-60. PubMed ID: 23436345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Charge-based particle separation in microfluidic devices using combined hydrodynamic and electrokinetic effects.
    Jellema LC; Mey T; Koster S; Verpoorte E
    Lab Chip; 2009 Jul; 9(13):1914-25. PubMed ID: 19532967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A microfluidic device for performing pressure-driven separations.
    Dutta D; Ramsey JM
    Lab Chip; 2011 Sep; 11(18):3081-8. PubMed ID: 21789335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffusion Split-Flow Thin Cell (SPLITT) system for protein separations.
    Merugu S; Sant HJ; Gale BK
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2012 Aug; 902():78-83. PubMed ID: 22795557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Particle separation in microfluidics using a switching ultrasonic field.
    Liu Y; Lim KM
    Lab Chip; 2011 Sep; 11(18):3167-73. PubMed ID: 21826293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple mechanism for reliable particle sorting in a microdevice with combined electroosmotic and pressure-driven flow.
    Johann R; Renaud P
    Electrophoresis; 2004 Nov; 25(21-22):3720-9. PubMed ID: 15565695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separation of mixtures of particles in a multipart microdevice employing insulator-based dielectrophoresis.
    Gallo-Villanueva RC; Pérez-González VH; Davalos RV; Lapizco-Encinas BH
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(18):2456-65. PubMed ID: 21874656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancement by optical force of separation in pinched flow fractionation.
    Lee KH; Kim SB; Lee KS; Sung HJ
    Lab Chip; 2011 Jan; 11(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 20957274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic-based microfluidic platform for biomolecular separation.
    Ramadan Q; Samper V; Poenar D; Yu C
    Biomed Microdevices; 2006 Jun; 8(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 16688574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic particle filter with adjustable effective pore size for automated sample preparation.
    Jung B; Fisher K; Ness KD; Rose KA; Mariella RP
    Anal Chem; 2008 Nov; 80(22):8447-52. PubMed ID: 18847218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.