These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23404470)

  • 1. How vision affects kinematic properties of pantomimed prehension movements.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():44. PubMed ID: 23404470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.
    Whitwell RL; Ganel T; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():216. PubMed ID: 25999834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):349-71. PubMed ID: 16707178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream.
    Westwood DA; Chapman CD; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Feb; 130(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 10717797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.
    Bingham G; Coats R; Mon-Williams M
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 17045314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.
    Kuntz JR; Karl JM; Doan JB; Whishaw IQ
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 236(4):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29441469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are We Real When We Fake? Attunement to Object Weight in Natural and Pantomimed Grasping Movements.
    Ansuini C; Cavallo A; Campus C; Quarona D; Koul A; Becchio C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():471. PubMed ID: 27713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Older Adolescents and Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder Have Difficulty Chaining Motor Acts When Performing Prehension Movements Compared to Typically Developing Peers.
    Fukui T; Sano M; Tanaka A; Suzuki M; Kim S; Agarie H; Fukatsu R; Nishimaki K; Nakajima Y; Wada M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():430. PubMed ID: 30405382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What does the brain do when you fake it? An FMRI study of pantomimed and real grasping.
    Króliczak G; Cavina-Pratesi C; Goodman DA; Culham JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 97(3):2410-22. PubMed ID: 17229828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of early phase online vision for grip configuration is modulated according to movement duration in prehension.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2257-68. PubMed ID: 25929554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unconscious updating of grasp motor program.
    Gentilucci M; Daprati E; Toni I; Chieffi S; Saetti MC
    Exp Brain Res; 1995; 105(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 7498382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of aperture closure initiation during reach-to-grasp movements under manipulations of visual feedback and trunk involvement in Parkinson's disease.
    Rand MK; Lemay M; Squire LM; Shimansky YP; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):509-25. PubMed ID: 19902195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vision for Prehension in the Medial Parietal Cortex.
    Fattori P; Breveglieri R; Bosco A; Gamberini M; Galletti C
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Feb; 27(2):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 26656999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptuo-motor interactions during prehension movements.
    Verhagen L; Dijkerman HC; Grol MJ; Toni I
    J Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 28(18):4726-35. PubMed ID: 18448649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manual and hemispheric asymmetries in the execution of actual and pantomimed prehension.
    Laimgruber K; Goldenberg G; Hermsdörfer J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):682-92. PubMed ID: 15721181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position.
    Paulignan Y; MacKenzie C; Marteniuk R; Jeannerod M
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 83(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 2026193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.