These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23404521)

  • 21. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Competitive Influences of Perceptual Load and Working Memory Guidance on Selective Attention.
    Tan J; Zhao Y; Wang L; Tian X; Cui Y; Yang Q; Pan W; Zhao X; Chen A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129533. PubMed ID: 26098079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiological evidence that top-down knowledge controls working memory processing for subsequent visual search.
    Kawashima T; Matsumoto E
    Neuroreport; 2016 Mar; 27(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 26872100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
    Pan Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relationship between working memory and the dual-target cost in visual search guidance.
    Menneer T; Cave KR; Kaplan E; Stroud MJ; Chang J; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):911-935. PubMed ID: 30985178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Top down modulation of attention to food cues via working memory.
    Higgs S; Rutters F; Thomas JM; Naish K; Humphreys GW
    Appetite; 2012 Aug; 59(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22450523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual search guidance uses coarser template information than target-match decisions.
    Yu X; Johal SK; Geng JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1432-1445. PubMed ID: 35474414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Action Planning Mediates Guidance of Visual Attention from Working Memory.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():387378. PubMed ID: 26171241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
    Wu Y; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 35359229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dividing the mind: the necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 16529778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The semantic category-based grouping in the Multiple Identity Tracking task.
    Wei L; Zhang X; Li Z; Liu J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):118-133. PubMed ID: 28956323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Good-enough attentional guidance.
    Yu X; Zhou Z; Becker SI; Boettcher SEP; Geng JJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2023 Apr; 27(4):391-403. PubMed ID: 36841692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
    Bahle B; Thayer DD; Mordkoff JT; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):967-983. PubMed ID: 31589068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.
    Telling AL; Kumar S; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2212-25. PubMed ID: 19803680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.