These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23405177)

  • 1. Binding in haptics: integration of "what" and "where" information in working memory for active touch.
    Delogu F; Bergmann Tiest WM; Nijboer TC; Kappers AM; Postma A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55606. PubMed ID: 23405177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Nature of Haptic Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Visual Working Memory.
    Morimoto T
    Multisens Res; 2020 Sep; 33(8):837-864. PubMed ID: 33706264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is working memory storage intrinsically domain-specific?
    Uittenhove K; Chaabi L; Camos V; Barrouillet P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Nov; 148(11):2027-2057. PubMed ID: 30829525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.
    Schneegans S; Bays PM
    J Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 37(14):3913-3925. PubMed ID: 28270569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recall cues interfere with retrieval from visuospatial working memory.
    Tabi YA; Husain M; Manohar SG
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):288-305. PubMed ID: 30604426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Item-location binding in working memory: is it hippocampus-dependent?
    Allen RJ; Vargha-Khadem F; Baddeley AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 59():74-84. PubMed ID: 24784006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of proactive interference on non-verbal working memory.
    Cyr M; Nee DE; Nelson E; Senger T; Jonides J; Malapani C
    Cogn Process; 2017 Feb; 18(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 27838866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of modality specific interference on working memory in recalling aversive auditory and visual memories
    Matthijssen SJMA; van Schie K; van den Hout MA
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 30465479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influences on memory for naturalistic visual episodes: sleep, familiarity, and traits differentially affect forms of recall.
    Coutanche MN; Koch GE; Paulus JP
    Learn Mem; 2020 Jul; 27(7):284-291. PubMed ID: 32540918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Liu S; Lei Q
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1498-1514. PubMed ID: 31267436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What does visual suffix interference tell us about spatial location in working memory?
    Allen RJ; Castellà J; Ueno T; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 25030081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual and Haptic influences on memory: age differences in recall.
    Stadtlander LM; Murdoch LD; Heiser SM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(3):257-72. PubMed ID: 9642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval from long-term memory reduces working memory representations for visual features and their bindings.
    van Lamsweerde AE; Beck MR; Elliott EM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 25301564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working memory inefficiency: minimal information is utilized in visual recognition tasks.
    Chen Z; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1449-62. PubMed ID: 23421509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New perspectives on binding in visual working memory.
    Schneegans S; Bays PM
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):207-244. PubMed ID: 30295318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 29346019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture.
    Kaas AL; van Mier H; Visser M; Goebel R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 May; 34(5):1148-62. PubMed ID: 22576840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory.
    Markov YA; Utochkin IS; Brady TF
    J Vis; 2021 Mar; 21(3):18. PubMed ID: 33729452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequence of stroke for feature recall and binding in visual working memory.
    Lugtmeijer S; Schneegans S; Lammers NA; Geerligs L; de Leeuw FE; de Haan EHF; Bays PM; Kessels RPC
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2021 Mar; 179():107387. PubMed ID: 33460791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.