161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23405504)
1. [Operative office hysteroscopy using bipolar technology. Our experience in seven years].
Alanís Fuentes J; Mancera Pantoja OA; Lara Figueroa JG
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2012 Dec; 80(12):749-52. PubMed ID: 23405504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in postmenopausal women: a comparison between mechanical and electrosurgical resection.
Garuti G; Centinaio G; Luerti M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 18722972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia: advantages and limits.
Litta P; Cosmi E; Saccardi C; Esposito C; Rui R; Ambrosini G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 18248873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies.
Bettocchi S; Bramante S; Bifulco G; Spinelli M; Ceci O; Fascilla FD; Di Spiezio Sardo A
Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):e16-e17. PubMed ID: 26873675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysteroscopic bipolar surgery: a valuable progress or a technique under investigation?
Garuti G; Luerti M
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 21(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 19512926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Usefulness of office hysteroscopy].
Ganem AS; López Ortiz CG; Alva CA; Bernal PQ; Dorantes JP
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Feb; 74(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16637379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [In-office hysteroscopic polypectomy: eight years analysis].
Alanís Fuentes J
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2007 Jun; 75(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 18297859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operative hysteroscopy in an office-based surgical setting: review of patient safety and satisfaction in 414 cases.
Wortman M; Daggett A; Ball C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 23107759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Case-control study of complications associated with bipolar and monopolar hysteroscopic operations.
Bahar R; Shimonovitz M; Benshushan A; Shushan A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 23453765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small-diameter hysteroscopy with Versapoint versus resectoscopy with a unipolar knife for the treatment of septate uterus: a prospective randomized study.
Colacurci N; De Franciscis P; Mollo A; Litta P; Perino A; Cobellis L; De Placido G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):622-7. PubMed ID: 17848325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy: Clinical and Economic Data in Decision Making.
Franchini M; Lippi G; Calzolari S; Giarrè G; Gubbini G; Catena U; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Florio P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):418-425. PubMed ID: 29499791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of different size-hysteroscope in office hysteroscopy: our experience.
Romani F; Guido M; Morciano A; Martinez D; Gaglione R; Lanzone A; Selvaggi L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1355-9. PubMed ID: 23797933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Office hysteroscopy: comparison of 2.7- and 4-mm hysteroscopes for acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy.
Rullo S; Sorrenti G; Marziali M; Ermini B; Sesti F; Piccione E
J Reprod Med; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15730173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysteroscopic morcellation compared with electrical resection of endometrial polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
Smith PP; Middleton LJ; Connor M; Clark TJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 123(4):745-51. PubMed ID: 24785600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term complications of office hysteroscopy: analysis of 1028 cases.
van Kerkvoorde TC; Veersema S; Timmermans A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):494-7. PubMed ID: 22564927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy.
Campo R; Molinas CR; Rombauts L; Mestdagh G; Lauwers M; Braekmans P; Brosens I; Van Belle Y; Gordts S
Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):258-63. PubMed ID: 15550496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AlphaScope vs lens-based hysteroscope for office polypectomy without anesthesia: randomized controlled study.
Cicinelli E; Tinelli R; Loiudice L; Loiudice I; Quattromini P; Fusco A; Cicinelli MV; Pinto V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):796-9. PubMed ID: 22024266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal of Endometrial Polyps: Hysteroscopic Morcellation versus Bipolar Resectoscopy, A Randomized Trial.
Hamerlynck TW; Schoot BC; van Vliet HA; Weyers S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1237-43. PubMed ID: 26192235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modern operative hysteroscopy.
Centini G; Troia L; Lazzeri L; Petraglia F; Luisi S
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Apr; 68(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 26930389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outpatient Hysteroscopic Polypectomy: Bipolar Energy System (Versapoint®) versus Mechanical Energy System (TRUCLEAR System®) - Preliminary Results.
Rovira Pampalona J; Degollada Bastos M; Mancebo Moreno G; Ratia Garcia E; Buron Pust A; Mateu Pruñonosa JC; Guerra Garcia A; Carreras Collado R; Bresco Torras P
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 25824810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
