325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23406492)
1. The impact of glaucoma referral refinement criteria on referral to, and first-visit discharge rates from, the hospital eye service: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23406492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of changes in referral behaviour following NICE guideline publication on agreement of examination findings between professionals in an established glaucoma referral refinement pathway: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 97(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 23111242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).
Bourne RR; French KA; Chang L; Borman AD; Hingorani M; Newsom WD
Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?
Vernon SA; Ghosh G
Eye (Lond); 2001 Aug; 15(Pt 4):458-63. PubMed ID: 11767019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines.
Khan S; Clarke J; Kotecha A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 23009293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effectiveness of two enhanced glaucoma referral schemes.
Parkins DJ; Edgar DF
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jul; 31(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 21615447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme.
Ratnarajan G; Kean J; French K; Parker M; Bourne R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?
Trikha S; Macgregor C; Jeffery M; Kirwan J
Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1288-94. PubMed ID: 22766539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis of patients discharged from a hospital-based glaucoma case-finding clinic over a 3-year period.
Salmon NJ; Terry HP; Farmery AD; Salmon JF
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 17584292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland.
Sii S; Nasser A; Loo CY; Croghan C; Rotchford A; Agarwal PK
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 103(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 29777044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of glaucoma referrals in Southeast Scotland: effect of the new general ophthalmic service contract, Eyecare integration pilot programme and NICE guidelines.
El-Assal K; Foulds J; Dobson S; Sanders R
BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 15():172. PubMed ID: 26643710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.
Bowling B; Chen SD; Salmon JF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 89(9):1102-4. PubMed ID: 16113358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Community refinement of glaucoma referrals.
Henson DB; Spencer AF; Harper R; Cadman EJ
Eye (Lond); 2003 Jan; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12579165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice.
Barrett C; O'Brien C; Loughman J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):400-410. PubMed ID: 29492992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service.
Devarajan N; Williams GS; Hopes M; O'Sullivan D; Jones D
Eye (Lond); 2011 Jan; 25(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 20966973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme.
Keenan J; Shahid H; Bourne RR; White AJ; Martin KR
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 43(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25070417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of schemes that refine referrals between primary and secondary care--the UK experience with glaucoma referrals: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways Project.
Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; Vernon SA; Fenerty C; Henson D; Spencer F; Wang Y; Harper R; McNaught A; Collins L; Parker M; Lawrenson J; Hudson R; Khaw PT; Wormald R; Garway-Heath D; Bourne R
BMJ Open; 2013; 3(7):. PubMed ID: 23878172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Community optometrist referral of those aged 65 and over for raised IOP post-NICE: AOP guidance versus joint college guidance--an epidemiological model using BEAP.
Vernon SA; Hillman JG; Macnab HK; Bacon P; van der Hoek J; Vernon OK; Bhargarva A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 95(11):1534-6. PubMed ID: 21310800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.
Huang J; Yapp M; Hennessy MP; Ly A; Masselos K; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Zangerl B
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):675-683. PubMed ID: 31852027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ophthalmic digital image transfer: benefits to triage, patient care and resource.
Goudie C; Lunt D; Reid S; Sanders R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Nov; 34(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 25223370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
