263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23406987)
1. Focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a dosimetric comparison of hemigland vs. conventional whole-gland treatment.
Kamrava M; Chung MP; Kayode O; Wang J; Marks L; Kupelian P; Steinberg M; Park SJ; Demanes DJ
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 23406987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From whole gland to hemigland to ultra-focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: A dosimetric analysis.
Banerjee R; Park SJ; Anderson E; Demanes DJ; Wang J; Kamrava M
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 25680768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric benefits of hemigland stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.
Kishan AU; Park SJ; King CR; Roberts K; Kupelian PA; Steinberg ML; Kamrava M
Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150658. PubMed ID: 26463234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetry modeling for focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Mason J; Al-Qaisieh B; Bownes P; Thwaites D; Henry A
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):611-7. PubMed ID: 25085456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel urethral sparing technique for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Kunogi H; Cunha JAM; Chang AJ; Gadzinski AJ; Shinohara K; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(6):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 28869143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional planning techniques using an intravaginal multichannel balloon applicator for high-dose-rate gynecologic brachytherapy.
Park SJ; Chung M; Demanes DJ; Banerjee R; Steinberg M; Kamrava M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 24138921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric evaluation of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost treatments for localized prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Agoston P; Lövey J; Somogyi A; Fodor J; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Jul; 186(7):388-95. PubMed ID: 20582396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry Modeling for Focal Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy.
Al-Qaisieh B; Mason J; Bownes P; Henry A; Dickinson L; Ahmed HU; Emberton M; Langley S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 25936808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Point A vs. HR-CTV D
Harmon G; Diak A; Shea SM; Yacoub JH; Small W; Harkenrider MM
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):825-831. PubMed ID: 27693173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.
Frank CH; Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Ruan D; Park SJ; Chang AJ; Venkat PS; Kishan AU; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6525-6534. PubMed ID: 37650773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy consistently results in high quality dosimetry.
White EC; Kamrava MR; Demarco J; Park SJ; Wang PC; Kayode O; Steinberg ML; Demanes DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 22652111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of inverse dose optimization for ultrasound-based high-dose-rate boost brachytherapy: how we do it in Kiel.
Siebert FA; Wolf S; Bertermann H; Nürnberg N; Bockelmann G; Kimmig B
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 24613132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deformable image registration-based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.
Chapman CH; Polan D; Vineberg K; Jolly S; Maturen KE; Brock KK; Prisciandaro JI
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 29331573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A stochastic frontier analysis for enhanced treatment quality of high-dose-rate brachytherapy plans.
Edimo P; Kroshko A; Beaulieu L; Archambault L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065012. PubMed ID: 30731437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans.
Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An open-source genetic algorithm for determining optimal seed distributions for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
McGeachy P; Madamesila J; Beauchamp A; Khan R
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 26023047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
